Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38393084›Full record

ReviewVeterinary sciences2024

Uterine Disease in Dairy Cows: A Comprehensive Review Highlighting New Research Areas.

Zsóka Várhidi, György Csikó, Árpád Csaba Bajcsy, Viktor Jurkovich

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Aqueous Extract ofVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zsóka VárhidiDepartment of Animal Hygiene, Herd Health and Mobile Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1078 Budapest, Hungary.
György CsikóDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1078 Budapest, Hungary.
Árpád Csaba BajcsyClinic for Cattle, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30173 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4597-8048
Viktor JurkovichCentre for Animal Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1078 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-6019-3508
University of Veterinary Medicine · HUUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DE

Funding

National Research, Development and Innovation Office 2020-1.1.2-PIACI-KFI-2020-00002University of Veterinary Medicine SRF-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine disease is an intensely studied part of dairy cattle health management as it heavily affects many commercial dairy farms and has serious economic consequences. Forms of the disease, pathophysiology, pathogens involved and the effects of uterine disease on the health and performance of cows have already been well described by various authors. Lately, researchers' attention has shifted towards the healthy microbiome of the uterus and the vagina to put emphasis on prevention rather than treatment. This aligns with the growing demand to reduce the use of antibiotics or-whenever possible-replace them with alternative treatment options in farm animal medicine. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the last 20 years of uterine disease research and highlights promising new areas for future studies.

Indexed as

dairy cowprobioticsuterine disease microbiome

Identifiers

PMID38393084
PMCPMC10893454
OpenAlexW4391486623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.