Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38392960›Full record

ArticleNeurology international2024

Effectiveness of Switching CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Non-Responder Patients in the UAE: A Retrospective Study.

Reem Suliman, Vanessa Santos, Ibrahim Al Qaisi, Batool Aldaher, Ahmed Al Fardan, Hajir Al Barrawy, Yazan Bader, Jonna Lyn Supena, Kathrina Alejandro, Taoufik Alsaadi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Reem SulimanAmerican Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 108699, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0009-0002-9607-3353
Vanessa SantosAmerican Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 108699, United Arab Emirates.
Ibrahim Al QaisiAmerican Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 108699, United Arab Emirates.
Batool AldaherAmerican Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 108699, United Arab Emirates.
Ahmed Al FardanAmerican Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 108699, United Arab Emirates.
Hajir Al BarrawyAmerican Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 108699, United Arab Emirates.
Yazan BaderAmerican Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 108699, United Arab Emirates.
Jonna Lyn SupenaAmerican Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 108699, United Arab Emirates.
Kathrina AlejandroAmerican Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 108699, United Arab Emirates.
Taoufik AlsaadiAmerican Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 108699, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-7513-5706

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) have shown promising effectiveness in migraine management compared to other preventative treatment options. Many questions remain regarding switching between antibody classes as a treatment option in patients with migraine headaches. This preliminary retrospective real-world study explored the treatment response of patients who switched between CGRP mAb classes due to lack of efficacy or poor tolerability. A total of 53 patients with migraine headache switched between three of the CGRP mAbs types due to lack of efficacy of the original prescribed CGRP mAbs, specifically eptinezumab, erenumab, and galcanezumab. Fremanezumab was not included due to unavailability in the UAE. Galcanezumab and eptinezumab target the CGRP ligand (CGRP/L), while erenumab targets CGRP receptors (CGRP/R). The analysis of efficacy demonstrated that some improvements were seen in both class switch cohorts (CGRP/R to CGRP/L and CGRP/L to CGRP/R). The safety of switching between CGRP classes was well observed, as any adverse events presented before the class switch did not lead to the discontinuation of treatment following the later switch. The findings of this study suggest that switching between different classes of CGRP mAbs is a potentially safe and clinically viable practice that may have some applications for those experiencing side effects on their current CGRP mAb or those witnessing suboptimal response.

Indexed as

CGRP monoclonal antibodieseffectivenessmigraineswitchingtreatment

Identifiers

PMID38392960
PMCPMC10893254
OpenAlexW4391994843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.