Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38392955›Full record

ReviewNeurology international2024

Processing Speed and Attentional Shift/Mental Flexibility in Patients with Stroke: A Comprehensive Review on the Trail Making Test in Stroke Studies.

Anna Tsiakiri, Foteini Christidi, Dimitrios Tsiptsios, Pinelopi Vlotinou, Sofia Kitmeridou, Paschalina Bebeletsi, Christos Kokkotis, Aspasia Serdari, Konstantinos Tsamakis, Nikolaos Aggelousis and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Computerized Platform in Hindi Language: Exploring Its Use in Aphasia Screening.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna TsiakiriNeurology Department, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 681 00 Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3341-4093
Foteini ChristidiNeurology Department, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 681 00 Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Dimitrios TsiptsiosNeurology Department, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 681 00 Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-1601-8788
Pinelopi VlotinouNeurology Department, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 681 00 Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-8828-9093
Sofia KitmeridouNeurology Department, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 681 00 Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Paschalina BebeletsiNeurology Department, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 681 00 Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Christos KokkotisDepartment of Physical Education and Sport Science, Democritus University of Thrace, 691 00 Komotini, Greece.
Aspasia SerdariDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 681 00 Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Konstantinos TsamakisInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London SE5 8AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0063-8413
Nikolaos AggelousisDepartment of Physical Education and Sport Science, Democritus University of Thrace, 691 00 Komotini, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-5108-7335
Konstantinos VadikoliasNeurology Department, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 681 00 Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0484-369X
Democritus University of Thrace · GRKing's College London · GB

Funding

NSRFm2014-2020 MIS 5047286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Trail Making Test (TMT) is one of the most commonly administered tests in clinical and research neuropsychological settings. The two parts of the test (part A (TMT-A) and part B (TMT-B)) enable the evaluation of visuoperceptual tracking and processing speed (TMT-A), as well as divided attention, set-shifting and cognitive flexibility (TMT-B). The main cognitive processes that are assessed using TMT, i.e., processing speed, divided attention, and cognitive flexibility, are often affected in patients with stroke. Considering the wide use of TMT in research and clinical settings since its introduction in neuropsychological practice, the purpose of our review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of TMT in stroke patients. We present the most representative studies assessing processing speed and attentional shift/mental flexibility in stroke settings using TMT and applying scoring methods relying on conventional TMT scores (e.g., time-to-complete part A and part B), as well as derived measures (e.g., TMT-(B-A) difference score, TMT-(B/A) ratio score, errors in part A and part B). We summarize the cognitive processes commonly associated with TMT performance in stroke patients (e.g., executive functions), lesion characteristics and neuroanatomical underpinning of TMT performance post-stroke, the association between TMT performance and patients' instrumental activities of daily living, motor difficulties, speech difficulties, and mood statue, as well as their driving ability. We also highlight how TMT can serve as an objective marker of post-stroke cognitive recovery following the implementation of interventions. Our comprehensive review underscores that the TMT stands as an invaluable asset in the stroke assessment toolkit, contributing nuanced insights into diverse cognitive, functional, and emotional dimensions. As research progresses, continued exploration of the TMT potential across these domains is encouraged, fostering a deeper comprehension of post-stroke dynamics and enhancing patient-centered care across hospitals, rehabilitation centers, research institutions, and community health settings. Its integration into both research and clinical practice reaffirms TMT status as an indispensable instrument in stroke-related evaluations, enabling holistic insights that extend beyond traditional neurological assessments.

Indexed as

cognitive flexibilitydivided attentionprocessing speedstrokeTrail Making Test

Identifiers

PMID38392955
PMCPMC10893544
OpenAlexW4391134894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.