Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38392759›Full record

ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Contacts at the Nanoscale and for Nanomaterials.

Hei Wong, Jieqiong Zhang, Jun Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hei WongDepartment of Electrical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Jieqiong ZhangHubei Jiu Feng Shan Laboratory, Wuhan 430074, China.
Jun LiuHubei Jiu Feng Shan Laboratory, Wuhan 430074, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contact scaling is a major challenge in nano complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology, as the surface roughness, contact size, film thicknesses, and undoped substrate become more problematic as the technology shrinks to the nanometer range. These factors increase the contact resistance and the nonlinearity of the current-voltage characteristics, which could limit the benefits of the further downsizing of CMOS devices. This review discusses issues related to the contact size reduction of nano CMOS technology and the validity of the Schottky junction model at the nanoscale. The difficulties, such as the limited doping level and choices of metal for band alignment, Fermi-level pinning, and van der Waals gap, in achieving transparent ohmic contacts with emerging two-dimensional materials are also examined. Finally, various methods for improving ohmic contacts' characteristics, such as two-dimensional/metal van der Waals contacts and hybrid contacts, junction doping technology, phase and bandgap modification effects, buffer layers, are highlighted.

Indexed as

2D material/metal contactscontact scalingmetal/semiconductor contactohmic contactSchottky contact

Identifiers

PMID38392759
PMCPMC10893407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.