ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
The Effect of Substrate Properties on Cellular Behavior and Nanoparticle Uptake in Human Fibroblasts and Epithelial Cells.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cellular Uptake of Nanoparticles is Regulated by Integrin-Based Adhesion to the Extracellular Matrix.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Uptake of Micro- and Nano-Sized Plastic Particles in Human Cells: Size-Dependent Endocytosis and Cellular Responses.BioMed research international · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Culture of Epithelial Cells on Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffolds.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Biodegradable Nanofiber Membranes for Air-Liquid Interface Culture: Advancing AirwayACS omega · 2025Article
- Current Utilization of Gel-Based Scaffolds and Templates in Foot and Ankle Surgery-A Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Moving Toward Biomimetic Tissue-Engineered Scaffolds.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The delivery of nanomedicines into cells holds enormous therapeutic potential; however little is known regarding how the extracellular matrix (ECM) can influence cell-nanoparticle (NP) interactions. Changes in ECM organization and composition occur in several pathophysiological states, including fibrosis and tumorigenesis, and may contribute to disease progression. We show that the physical characteristics of cellular substrates, that more closely resemble the ECM in vivo, can influence cell behavior and the subsequent uptake of NPs. Electrospinning was used to create two different substrates made of soft polyurethane (PU) with aligned and non-aligned nanofibers to recapitulate the ECM in two different states. To investigate the impact of cell-substrate interaction, A549 lung epithelial cells and MRC-5 lung fibroblasts were cultured on soft PU membranes with different alignments and compared against stiff tissue culture plastic (TCP)/glass. Both cell types could attach and grow on both PU membranes with no signs of cytotoxicity but with increased cytokine release compared with cells on the TCP. The uptake of silica NPs increased more than three-fold in fibroblasts but not in epithelial cells cultured on both membranes. This study demonstrates that cell-matrix interaction is substrate and cell-type dependent and highlights the importance of considering the ECM and tissue mechanical properties when designing NPs for effective cell targeting and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.