ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2024
Advancements in Bariatric Surgery: A Comparative Review of Laparoscopic and Robotic Techniques.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exploring the Relationship Between Obesity, Weight Loss and Health-Related Quality of Life: An Updated Systematic Review of Reviews.Clinical obesity · 2026Pooled it
- Laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominis plane block combined with port-site infiltration for postoperative analgesia after gastric bypass: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Trial
- Technology and Obesity: A Year in Review.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Ondansetron versus gabapentin in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a randomized study.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Beyond Weight Loss: A Comprehensive Review of Integrated Pharmacotherapy and Metabolic Bariatric Surgery in Endometrial Cancer Care.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Laparoscopic (L-) versus Robotic Assisted (RA-) Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass (RYGB): effects on lung function, respiratory muscle strength, and physical activity after six months.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Postoperative Risk Evolves in the Operating Room: Incremental Value of Routine Intraoperative Variables After Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Review
- Feasibility and early safety outcomes of robotic-assisted bariatric surgery using the VersiusJournal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Prospective comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: real-life analysis of procedural standardization and safety during the initial adoption phase.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic bariatric surgery: the Italian point of view to go beyond.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Robotic 3-arm Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a feasible, safe and cost-effective approach based on patient selection.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- The real evolution: robotic surgery as a teaching tool, not a threat.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- More procedures, more efficiency: optimizing operating room during the phase of learning curve-experience of first 100 robotic bariatric procedures in a single center.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Review
- Raising Concerns About Perioperative Outcomes Using Single-Fire Stapler During Sleeve Gastrectomies.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Comparison between DaVinciJournal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Review
- Long-Term Outcomes and Safety of Robotic Bariatric Surgery.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article examines the evolution of bariatric surgery, with a focus on emerging technologies such as robotics and laparoscopy. In the case of gastric bypass, no significant differences have emerged between the two techniques in terms of hospitalization duration, weight loss, weight regain, or 30-day mortality. Robotic surgery, while requiring more time in the operating room, has been associated with lower rates of bleeding, mortality, transfusions, and infections. In revisional bariatric surgery, the robotic approach has shown fewer complications, shorter hospital stays, and a reduced need for conversion to open surgery. In the case of sleeve gastrectomy, robotic procedures have required more time and longer postoperative stays but have recorded lower rates of transfusions and bleeding compared to laparoscopy. However, robotic surgeries have proven to be more costly and potentially more complex in terms of postoperative complications. The review has also addressed the topic of the single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal switch (SADIS), finding comparable results between robotic and laparoscopic techniques, although robotic procedures have required more time in the operating room. Robotic technology has proven to be safe and effective, albeit with slightly longer operative times in some cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.