Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38392383›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Directed Network Comparison Using Motifs.

Chenwei Xie, Qiao Ke, Haoyu Chen, Chuang Liu, Xiu-Xiu Zhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chenwei XieResearch Center for Complexity Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.
Qiao KeResearch Center for Complexity Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.
Haoyu ChenResearch Center for Complexity Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.
Chuang LiuResearch Center for Complexity Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.
Xiu-Xiu ZhanResearch Center for Complexity Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9013-7590

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of China 61873080Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LQ22F030008the Scientific Research Foundation for Scholars of HZNU 2021QDL030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analyzing and characterizing the differences between networks is a fundamental and challenging problem in network science. Most previous network comparison methods that rely on topological properties have been restricted to measuring differences between two undirected networks. However, many networks, such as biological networks, social networks, and transportation networks, exhibit inherent directionality and higher-order attributes that should not be ignored when comparing networks. Therefore, we propose a motif-based directed network comparison method that captures local, global, and higher-order differences between two directed networks. Specifically, we first construct a motif distribution vector for each node, which captures the information of a node's involvement in different directed motifs. Then, the dissimilarity between two directed networks is defined on the basis of a matrix, which is composed of the motif distribution vector of every node and the Jensen-Shannon divergence. The performance of our method is evaluated via the comparison of six real directed networks with their null models, as well as their perturbed networks based on edge perturbation. Our method is superior to the state-of-the-art baselines and is robust with different parameter settings.

Indexed as

directed networksJensen–Shannon divergencemotifsnetwork comparison

Identifiers

PMID38392383
PMCPMC10887553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.