Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38392363›Full record

ReviewEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Emergence and Causality in Complex Systems: A Survey of Causal Emergence and Related Quantitative Studies.

Bing Yuan, Jiang Zhang, Aobo Lyu, Jiayun Wu, Zhipeng Wang, Mingzhe Yang, Kaiwei Liu, Muyun Mou, Peng Cui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Protein foundation models: a comprehensive survey.Science China. Life sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A reframed landscape of causal emergence.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  10. Quantifying emergent complexity.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  11. How causal is "circular causality"?Frontiers in network physiology · 2026
    Article
  12. Intrinsic units: identifying a system's causal grain.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bing YuanSwarma Research, Beijing 100085, China.ORCID 0009-0007-9062-0383
Jiang ZhangSwarma Research, Beijing 100085, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7402-7482
Aobo LyuDepartment of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5565-5747
Jiayun WuDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0009-0007-7131-7290
Zhipeng WangSchool of Systems Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Mingzhe YangSchool of Systems Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Kaiwei LiuSchool of Systems Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0343-3488
Muyun MouSchool of Systems Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Peng CuiDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergence and causality are two fundamental concepts for understanding complex systems. They are interconnected. On one hand, emergence refers to the phenomenon where macroscopic properties cannot be solely attributed to the cause of individual properties. On the other hand, causality can exhibit emergence, meaning that new causal laws may arise as we increase the level of abstraction. Causal emergence (CE) theory aims to bridge these two concepts and even employs measures of causality to quantify emergence. This paper provides a comprehensive review of recent advancements in quantitative theories and applications of CE. It focuses on two primary challenges: quantifying CE and identifying it from data. The latter task requires the integration of machine learning and neural network techniques, establishing a significant link between causal emergence and machine learning. We highlight two problem categories: CE with machine learning and CE for machine learning, both of which emphasize the crucial role of effective information (EI) as a measure of causal emergence. The final section of this review explores potential applications and provides insights into future perspectives.

Indexed as

causal emergencecausal emergence identificationcausalityeffective informationemergencemachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38392363
PMCPMC10887681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.