Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38392232›Full record

ReviewDentistry journal2024

Mapping the Landscape of the Digital Workflow of Esthetic Veneers from Design to Cementation: A Systematic Review.

Walaa Magdy Ahmed, Amr Ahmed Azhari, Lamer Sedayo, Alanod Alhaid, Reem Alhandar, Amirah Almalki, Aishah Jahlan, Afnan Almutairi, Waad Kheder

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dentistry journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Achieving Functional and Aesthetic Harmony Through a Fully Digital Workflow for Lateral Agenesis Rehabilitation: A 12-Month Follow-Up.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Fracture load of chairside CAD-CAM veneers fabricated with pre-and fully crystalized lithium disilicate ceramics.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Walaa Magdy AhmedDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah P.O. Box 80213, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-1810-8733
Amr Ahmed AzhariDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah P.O. Box 80213, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8749-4714
Lamer SedayoFaculty of Dental Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah P.O. Box 16786, Saudi Arabia.
Alanod AlhaidDental Department, King Khalid University, Asir P.O. Box 61421, Saudi Arabia.
Reem AlhandarDental Department, Vision College, Riyadh P.O. Box 13226, Saudi Arabia.
Amirah AlmalkiDental Department, Specialized Dental Complex, Jeddah P.O. Box 21444, Saudi Arabia.
Aishah JahlanDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Suliman Al-Habib Hospital, Riyadh P.O. Box 301578, Saudi Arabia.
Afnan AlmutairiDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Suliman Al-Habib Hospital, Riyadh P.O. Box 301578, Saudi Arabia.
Waad KhederDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0001-6938-9913

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review was to map all the existing literature on digitally designed and fabricated esthetic veneers. We aimed to compare the accuracy of digitally designed preparation and cementation guides for esthetic indirect veneers with the conventional workflow. We evaluated studies comparing the accuracy and predictability of workflows between digitally fabricated indirect-esthetic veneers and conventional indirect veneers. Searches were performed in August 2023 across three databases, specifically Google Scholar, Cochrane, and PubMed, and were restricted to English-language publications. The search strategy was based on the PICO criteria. Reference lists of identified articles were manually checked to find further pertinent studies that were not discovered during the electronic search. The titles and abstracts were reviewed in the first stage, and then the full article texts were reviewed and cross-matched against the predetermined inclusion criteria. Following the search, 169 articles were identified: 41 from Google Scholar, 44 from Cochrane, and 71 from PubMed, with 13 added manually. Of these, 20 were chosen for a detailed quality assessment of the digital veneer workflow and the accuracy of digital preparations and cementation guides for laminate veneers. Based on our findings, the digitally fabricated laminate-veneer workflow demonstrated superior predictability and accuracy compared to the conventional workflow.

Indexed as

accuracycementation guidedigital dentistrydigital smile designesthetic dentistryesthetic veneerpreparation guide

Identifiers

PMID38392232
PMCPMC10888163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.