ReviewJournal of Intelligence2024
Predicting Everyday Critical Thinking: A Review of Critical Thinking Assessments.
Review in Journal of Intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Willingness to Practice: A Person-Centered Study of Primary Teachers' Critical-Thinking Readiness and the Enactment Gap.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- The Nature and Measure of Critical Thinking: The PACIER Framework and Assessment.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- An Editorial Introduction to Critical Thinking in Everyday Settings.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- Exploring faculty perspectives on critical thinking in medical education: Challenges, strategies, and institutional support.Saudi medical journal · 2025Article
- Critical Thinking in Initial Teacher Training: An Empirical Study from Chile.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Association of critical thinking disposition with personality traits and differentiation of self in medical undergraduates, a multicenter cross-sectional study in China.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Assessing Students' Critical Thinking in Dialogue.Journal of Intelligence · 2024Article
- Classification of Higher-Order Thinking Skills of the Teachers Based on Institution, Seniority, and Branch with Discriminant Analysis.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our ability to think critically and our disposition to do so can have major implications for our everyday lives. Research across the globe has shown the impact of critical thinking on decisions about our health, politics, relationships, finances, consumer purchases, education, work, and more. This chapter will review some of that research. Given the importance of critical thinking to our everyday lives, the fair and unbiased assessment of critical thinking is useful for guiding educators in their classrooms, for the sake of self-improvement, and in employment decisions. This chapter will also review the psychometric properties of several critical thinking assessments, with a special emphasis on the everyday behaviors predicted by these assessments. The practical challenges faced by test adopters and future directions in the assessment of critical thinking will be discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.