Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38392093›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2024

Exploration of Interpretability Techniques for Deep COVID-19 Classification Using Chest X-ray Images.

Soumick Chatterjee, Fatima Saad, Chompunuch Sarasaen, Suhita Ghosh, Valerie Krug, Rupali Khatun, Rahul Mishra, Nirja Desai, Petia Radeva, Georg Rose and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Soumick ChatterjeeData and Knowledge Engineering Group, Otto von Guericke University, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7594-1188
Fatima SaadInstitute for Medical Engineering, Otto von Guericke University, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9732-4292
Chompunuch SarasaenInstitute for Medical Engineering, Otto von Guericke University, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4760-2263
Suhita GhoshFaculty of Computer Science, Otto von Guericke University, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Valerie KrugFaculty of Computer Science, Otto von Guericke University, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Rupali KhatunDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Rahul MishraApollo Hospitals, Bilaspur 495006, India.
Nirja DesaiHCG Cancer Centre, Vadodara 390012, India.
Petia RadevaDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Georg RoseInstitute for Medical Engineering, Otto von Guericke University, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Sebastian StoberFaculty of Computer Science, Otto von Guericke University, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1717-4133
Oliver SpeckResearch Campus STIMULATE, Otto von Guericke University, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6019-5597
Andreas NürnbergerData and Knowledge Engineering Group, Otto von Guericke University, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4311-0624

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outbreak of COVID-19 has shocked the entire world with its fairly rapid spread, and has challenged different sectors. One of the most effective ways to limit its spread is the early and accurate diagnosing of infected patients. Medical imaging, such as X-ray and computed tomography (CT), combined with the potential of artificial intelligence (AI), plays an essential role in supporting medical personnel in the diagnosis process. Thus, in this article, five different deep learning models (ResNet18, ResNet34, InceptionV3, InceptionResNetV2, and DenseNet161) and their ensemble, using majority voting, have been used to classify COVID-19, pneumoniæ and healthy subjects using chest X-ray images. Multilabel classification was performed to predict multiple pathologies for each patient, if present. Firstly, the interpretability of each of the networks was thoroughly studied using local interpretability methods-occlusion, saliency, input X gradient, guided backpropagation, integrated gradients, and DeepLIFT-and using a global technique-neuron activation profiles. The mean micro F1 score of the models for COVID-19 classifications ranged from 0.66 to 0.875, and was 0.89 for the ensemble of the network models. The qualitative results showed that the ResNets were the most interpretable models. This research demonstrates the importance of using interpretability methods to compare different models before making a decision regarding the best performing model.

Indexed as

chest X-rayCOVID-19deep learninginterpretability analysismodel ensemblemultilabel image classificationpneumonia

Identifiers

PMID38392093
PMCPMC10889835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.