ArticleJournal of imaging2024
A Lightweight Browser-Based Tool for Collaborative and Blinded Image Analysis.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Proximal humeral fractures in children - controversies in decision making.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Collaborative manual image analysis by multiple experts in different locations is an essential workflow in biomedical science. However, sharing the images and writing down results by hand or merging results from separate spreadsheets can be error-prone. Moreover, blinding and anonymization are essential to address subjectivity and bias. Here, we propose a new workflow for collaborative image analysis using a lightweight online tool named Tyche. The new workflow allows experts to access images via temporarily valid URLs and analyze them blind in a random order inside a web browser with the means to store the results in the same window. The results are then immediately computed and visible to the project master. The new workflow could be used for multi-center studies, inter- and intraobserver studies, and score validations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.