ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Quality of Life and Treatment Modalities in Patients with Interstitial Cystitis: The Patients' Perspective.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Potential Efficacy of Polyphenols and Isothiocyanates in the Management of Genitourinary Diseases: A Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: mechanisms, evidence, and translational perspectives-a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- Social Media as a Source of Information on Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome: Support Tool or Misinformation?Neurourology and urodynamics · 2026Article
- Sacral Neuromodulation Test-Phase Success in Bladder Pain Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Pelvic floor muscle pain is associated with higher symptom scores and bladder pain perception in women with interstitial cystitis and bladder pain syndrome.World journal of urology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuality of life (QoL)-based outcomes are hardly incorporated into interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) guidelines, because studies are limited and outdated. Therefore, guidelines might not reflect the current clinical situation accurately. Secondly, guidelines suggest using a multimodal approach for BPS/IC management, but data on the patient-perceived efficacy of these therapies are limited. The aim of this study is to investigate the perception of IC/BPS patients of their QoL, to determine which treatments they have received, and to examine how they evaluate the efficacy of these various (alternative) therapies.
methodsA quantitative retrospective database evaluation was performed, with data from an existing IC/BPS patient survey (
resultsThe QoL of patients is affected significantly by IC/BPS. This is evident from the various affected domains on the EQ-5D 5L. The symptom severity was negatively affected by a delay in diagnosis, and there were clear differences in QoL domains between females and males. Secondly, coagulation therapy and intravesical glycosaminoglycan (GAG) therapy were most appreciated by patients. Other (alternative) treatments were commonly utilized, although some had doubtful results and high discontinuation rates.
conclusionQoL is considerably impaired in IC/BPS patients. The diverse responses and adherence to various treatments warrant a personalized approach (phenotype-oriented therapy). To achieve QoL improvement, it is important to incorporate the patient's perspective in treatment guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.