Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38391839›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Gait Analysis of Hemiparetic Adult Patients with a Quadripod Cane and a Rolling Cane.

Bérengère Maillard, Mohamed Boutaayamou, Helena Cassol, Laurence Pirnay, Jean-François Kaux

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bérengère MaillardPhysical Medicine, Rehabilitation and Sports Traumatology Department, University Hospital of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0004-6608-7118
Mohamed BoutaayamouDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9564-528X
Helena CassolPhysical Medicine, Rehabilitation and Sports Traumatology Department, University Hospital of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6616-7688
Laurence PirnayPhysical Medicine, Rehabilitation and Sports Traumatology Department, University Hospital of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Jean-François KauxPhysical Medicine, Rehabilitation and Sports Traumatology Department, University Hospital of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1939-3652
University of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke consequences include hemiparesis and difficulty walking. Several types of canes exist to overcome these alterations, but little data compares the quadripod cane and the rolling cane in hemiparetic patients. The objective of this work is twofold: to determine whether the gait speed-the most often used parameter to assess gait performance-depends on the type of cane, and to establish which spatiotemporal parameters have the most influence. Thirty-four hemiparetic patients performed 10 m walking tests at comfortable and fast speed conditions, using both canes on two different days. To objectively analyze their gait patterns, we used a tri-axial Inertial Measurement Units (IMU)-based system to record the walking signals from which we extracted the gait spatiotemporal parameters. We particularly examined the speed, stride length, and durations of stance, swing, and double support phases. The results showed that hemiparetic patients walked faster with the rolling cane during both speed conditions. These speed increases could be explained by the decrease in the stance phase duration of the affected leg, the decrease in the double support duration, and the increase in cadence. Our findings suggest that the rolling cane allows safe and faster walking.

Indexed as

gait analysishemiparesisquadripod canerolling canestroke

Identifiers

PMID38391839
PMCPMC10888135
OpenAlexW4391744032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.