Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38391739›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2024

Different Effect Sizes of Motor Skill Training Combined with Repetitive Transcranial versus Trans-Spinal Magnetic Stimulation in Healthy Subjects.

Farsin Hamzei, Alexander Ritter, Kristin Pohl, Peggy Stäps, Eric Wieduwild

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Farsin HamzeiSection of Neurological Rehabilitation, Hans-Berger-Hospital of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0036-4368
Alexander RitterSection of Neurological Rehabilitation, Hans-Berger-Hospital of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8190-5175
Kristin PohlSection of Neurological Rehabilitation, Hans-Berger-Hospital of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Peggy StäpsDepartment of Neurology, Moritz Klinik, Hermann-Sachse-Straße 46, 07639 Bad Klosterlausnitz, Germany.
Eric WieduwildSection of Neurological Rehabilitation, Hans-Berger-Hospital of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Moritz Klinik · DEJena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is used to enhance motor training (MT) performance. The use of rTMS is limited under certain conditions, such as after a stroke with severe damage to the corticospinal tract. This raises the question as to whether repetitive trans-spinal magnetic stimulation (rSMS) can also be used to improve MT. A direct comparison of the effect size between rTMS and rSMS on the same MT is still lacking. Before conducting the study in patients, we determined the effect sizes of different stimulation approaches combined with the same motor training in healthy subjects. Two experiments (E1 and E2) with 96 subjects investigated the effect size of combining magnetic stimulation with the same MT. In E1, high-frequency rTMS, rSMS, and spinal sham stimulation (sham-spinal) were applied once in combination with MT, while one group only received the same MT (without stimulation). In E2, rTMS, rSMS, and sham-spinal were applied in combination with MT over several days. In all subjects, motor tests and motor-evoked potentials were evaluated before and after the intervention period. rTMS had the greatest effect on MT, followed by rSMS and then sham-spinal. Daily stimulation resulted in additional training gains. This study suggests that rSMS increases excitability and also enhances MT performance. This current study provides a basis for further research to discover whether patients who cannot be treated effectively with rTMS would benefit from rSMS.

Indexed as

motor skill trainingnon-invasive brain stimulationrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationrepetitive trans-spinal stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38391739
PMCPMC10887384
OpenAlexW4391568125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.