Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38391712›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2024

Unveiling the Diagnostic Potential of Linguistic Markers in Identifying Individuals with Parkinson's Disease through Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.

Cinzia Palmirotta, Simona Aresta, Petronilla Battista, Serena Tagliente, Gianvito Lagravinese, Davide Mongelli, Christian Gelao, Pietro Fiore, Isabella Castiglioni, Brigida Minafra and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The include network: Advancing cross-linguistic equity in brain health research.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cinzia PalmirottaIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, Bari Institute, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Simona ArestaIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, Bari Institute, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9032-6578
Petronilla BattistaIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, Bari Institute, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3120-1214
Serena TaglienteIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, Bari Institute, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Gianvito LagravineseIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, Bari Institute, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7717-3071
Davide MongelliIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, Bari Institute, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Christian GelaoIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Neurorehabilitation Unit of Bari Institute, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Pietro FioreIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Neurorehabilitation Unit of Bari Institute, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Isabella CastiglioniDepartment of Physics G. Occhialini, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Brigida MinafraIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Neurorehabilitation Unit of Bari Institute, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Christian SalvatoreDepartment of Science, Technology and Society, University School for Advanced Studies IUSS Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9312-4675
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · ITIstituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia · ITUniversity of Foggia · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While extensive research has documented the cognitive changes associated with Parkinson's disease (PD), a relatively small portion of the empirical literature investigated the language abilities of individuals with PD. Recently, artificial intelligence applied to linguistic data has shown promising results in predicting the clinical diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders, but a deeper investigation of the current literature available on PD is lacking. This systematic review investigates the nature of language disorders in PD by assessing the contribution of machine learning (ML) to the classification of patients with PD. A total of 10 studies published between 2016 and 2023 were included in this review. Tasks used to elicit language were mainly structured or unstructured narrative discourse. Transcriptions were mostly analyzed using Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques. The classification accuracy (%) ranged from 43 to 94, sensitivity (%) ranged from 8 to 95, specificity (%) ranged from 3 to 100, AUC (%) ranged from 32 to 97. The most frequent optimal linguistic measures were lexico-semantic (40%), followed by NLP-extracted features (26%) and morphological consistency features (20%). Artificial intelligence applied to linguistic markers provides valuable insights into PD. However, analyzing measures derived from narrative discourse can be time-consuming, and utilizing ML requires specialized expertise. Moving forward, it is important to focus on facilitating the integration of both narrative discourse analysis and artificial intelligence into clinical practice.

Indexed as

automated classificationdiscoursemachine learningnarrative speechnatural language processingPD

Identifiers

PMID38391712
PMCPMC10886733
OpenAlexW4391316195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.