ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Automated Diagnosis: A Motor vs. Sensory Nerve Conduction-Based Approach.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Hybrid Rule-Based and Large Language Model Artificial Intelligence System for Electrodiagnostic Reporting: Two-Center Retrospective Evaluation.Muscle & nerve · 2026Observational
- Explainable Ensemble Learning for Robust Severity Stratification of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome from Clinical Data.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Diagnosis: A Narrative Review of Complementary Roles of Neuromuscular Ultrasound and Electrodiagnostic Studies.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Review
- Article
- Intraoperative change in distal motor latency as a predictor for clinical outcome after mini-OCTR: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning classification techniques applied to nerve conduction studies (NCS) of motor and sensory signals for the automatic diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Two methodologies were tested. In the first methodology, motor signals recorded from the patients' median nerve were transformed into time-frequency spectrograms using the short-time Fourier transform (STFT). These spectrograms were then used as input to a deep two-dimensional convolutional neural network (CONV2D) for classification into two categories: patients and controls. In the second methodology, sensory signals from the patients' median and ulnar nerves were subjected to multilevel wavelet decomposition (MWD), and statistical and non-statistical features were extracted from the decomposed signals. These features were utilized to train and test classifiers. The classification target was set to three categories: normal subjects (controls), patients with mild CTS, and patients with moderate to severe CTS based on conventional electrodiagnosis results. The results of the classification analysis demonstrated that both methodologies surpassed previous attempts at automatic CTS diagnosis. The classification models utilizing the motor signals transformed into time-frequency spectrograms exhibited excellent performance, with average accuracy of 94%. Similarly, the classifiers based on the sensory signals and the extracted features from multilevel wavelet decomposition showed significant accuracy in distinguishing between controls, patients with mild CTS, and patients with moderate to severe CTS, with accuracy of 97.1%. The findings highlight the efficacy of incorporating machine learning algorithms into the diagnostic processes of NCS, providing a valuable tool for clinicians in the diagnosis and management of neuropathies such as CTS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.