Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38391650›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Development of End-to-End Artificial Intelligence Models for Surgical Planning in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Anh Tuan Bui, Hieu Le, Tung Thanh Hoang, Giam Minh Trinh, Hao-Chiang Shao, Pei-I Tsai, Kuan-Jen Chen, Kevin Li-Chun Hsieh, E-Wen Huang, Ching-Chi Hsu and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Anh Tuan BuiInternational Ph.D. Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8297-9536
Hieu LeSchool of Computer and Communication Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7855-2778
Tung Thanh HoangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Military Hospital 103, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.
Giam Minh TrinhDepartment of Trauma-Orthopedics, College of Medicine, Pham Ngoc Thach Medical University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam.
Hao-Chiang ShaoInstitute of Data Science and Information Computing, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3749-234X
Pei-I TsaiBiomedical Technology and Device Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu 31057, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3516-3120
Kuan-Jen ChenBiomedical Technology and Device Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu 31057, Taiwan.
Kevin Li-Chun HsiehDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
E-Wen HuangDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4986-0661
Ching-Chi HsuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2641-7923
Mathew MathewDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Colleges of Engineering and Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.
Ching-Yu LeeDepartment of Orthopedics, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Po-Yao WangDepartment of Orthopedics, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Tsung-Jen HuangDepartment of Orthopedics, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Meng-Huang WuDepartment of Orthopedics, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1606-2444

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a commonly used technique for treating lumbar degenerative diseases. In this study, we developed a fully computer-supported pipeline to predict both the cage height and the degree of lumbar lordosis subtraction from the pelvic incidence (PI-LL) after TLIF surgery, utilizing preoperative X-ray images. The automated pipeline comprised two primary stages. First, the pretrained BiLuNet deep learning model was employed to extract essential features from X-ray images. Subsequently, five machine learning algorithms were trained using a five-fold cross-validation technique on a dataset of 311 patients to identify the optimal models to predict interbody cage height and postoperative PI-LL. LASSO regression and support vector regression demonstrated superior performance in predicting interbody cage height and postoperative PI-LL, respectively. For cage height prediction, the root mean square error (RMSE) was calculated as 1.01, and the model achieved the highest accuracy at a height of 12 mm, with exact prediction achieved in 54.43% (43/79) of cases. In most of the remaining cases, the prediction error of the model was within 1 mm. Additionally, the model demonstrated satisfactory performance in predicting PI-LL, with an RMSE of 5.19 and an accuracy of 0.81 for PI-LL stratification. In conclusion, our results indicate that machine learning models can reliably predict interbody cage height and postoperative PI-LL.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceinterbody cagemachine learningsagittal balancespinal fusionspinal parameters

Identifiers

PMID38391650
PMCPMC10885900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.