ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Continuous Locomotion Mode and Task Identification for an Assistive Exoskeleton Based on Neuromuscular-Mechanical Fusion.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- User-Centered Evaluation of the Wearable Walker Lower Limb Exoskeleton; Preliminary Assessment Based on the Experience Protocol.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Human walking parameters exhibit significant variability depending on the terrain, speed, and load. Assistive exoskeletons currently focus on the recognition of locomotion terrain, ignoring the identification of locomotion tasks, which are also essential for control strategies. The aim of this study was to develop an interface for locomotion mode and task identification based on a neuromuscular-mechanical fusion algorithm. The modes of level and incline and tasks of speed and load were explored, and seven able-bodied participants were recruited. A continuous stream of assistive decisions supporting timely exoskeleton control was achieved according to the classification of locomotion. We investigated the optimal algorithm, feature set, window increment, window length, and robustness for precise identification and synchronization between exoskeleton assistive force and human limb movements (human-machine collaboration). The best recognition results were obtained when using a support vector machine, a root mean square/waveform length/acceleration feature set, a window length of 170, and a window increment of 20. The average identification accuracy reached 98.7% ± 1.3%. These results suggest that the surface electromyography-acceleration can be effectively used for locomotion mode and task identification. This study contributes to the development of locomotion mode and task recognition as well as exoskeleton control for seamless transitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.