ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Proactive Decision Support for Glaucoma Treatment: Predicting Surgical Interventions with Clinically Available Data.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk-Stratified Interventional Management and Surgical Decision-Making in Primary Glaucoma.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- A systematic review of AI for predicting glaucoma progression: challenges and recommendations towards clinical implementation.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- The AI-Augmented Ophthalmologist for chronic ocular diseases: a patient-centered framework for human-AI collaboration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Meeting Challenges in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Glaucoma.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Enhanced Data Mining and Visualization of Sensory-Graph-Modeled Datasets through Summarization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evaluating a Foundation Artificial Intelligence Model for Glaucoma Detection Using Color Fundus Photographs.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
- Barriers to Extracting and Harmonizing Glaucoma Testing Data: Gaps, Shortcomings, and the Pursuit of FAIRness.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
- Big data in visual field testing for glaucoma.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
- Optic Nerve Imaging-From Disc Photos to OCT.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaReview
- Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis of Ophthalmic Imaging Technology for Glaucoma Diagnosis from 2015 to 2024.Journal of current ophthalmologyArticle
- A neural network model for predicting the effectiveness of treatment in patients with neovascular glaucoma associated with diabetes mellitus.Romanian journal of ophthalmologyArticle
- Application of artificial intelligence in glaucoma care: An updated review.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A longitudinal ophthalmic dataset was used to investigate multi-modal machine learning (ML) models incorporating patient demographics and history, clinical measurements, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and visual field (VF) testing in predicting glaucoma surgical interventions. The cohort included 369 patients who underwent glaucoma surgery and 592 patients who did not undergo surgery. The data types used for prediction included patient demographics, history of systemic conditions, medication history, ophthalmic measurements, 24-2 VF results, and thickness measurements from OCT imaging. The ML models were trained to predict surgical interventions and evaluated on independent data collected at a separate study site. The models were evaluated based on their ability to predict surgeries at varying lengths of time prior to surgical intervention. The highest performing predictions achieved an AUC of 0.93, 0.92, and 0.93 in predicting surgical intervention at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years, respectively. The models were also able to achieve high sensitivity (0.89, 0.77, 0.86 at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively) and specificity (0.85, 0.90, and 0.91 at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively) at an 0.80 level of precision. The multi-modal models trained on a combination of data types predicted surgical interventions with high accuracy up to three years prior to surgery and could provide an important tool to predict the need for glaucoma intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.