Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38391616›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Deep Learning for Delineation of the Spinal Canal in Whole-Body Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Normalising Inter- and Intra-Patient Intensity Signal in Multi-Centre Datasets.

Antonio Candito, Richard Holbrey, Ana Ribeiro, Christina Messiou, Nina Tunariu, Dow-Mu Koh, Matthew D Blackledge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio CanditoDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3059-9328
Richard HolbreyDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK.
Ana RibeiroDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0510-4688
Christina MessiouDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0557-9379
Nina TunariuDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK.
Dow-Mu KohDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK.
Matthew D BlackledgeDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8117-9003
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) II-LA-0216-20007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhole-Body Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (WBDWI) is an established technique for staging and evaluating treatment response in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and advanced prostate cancer (APC). However, WBDWI scans show inter- and intra-patient intensity signal variability. This variability poses challenges in accurately quantifying bone disease, tracking changes over follow-up scans, and developing automated tools for bone lesion delineation. Here, we propose a novel automated pipeline for inter-station, inter-scan image signal standardisation on WBDWI that utilizes robust segmentation of the spinal canal through deep learning.

methodsWe trained and validated a supervised 2D U-Net model to automatically delineate the spinal canal (both the spinal cord and surrounding cerebrospinal fluid, CSF) in an initial cohort of 40 patients who underwent WBDWI for treatment response evaluation (80 scans in total). Expert-validated contours were used as the target standard. The algorithm was further semi-quantitatively validated on four additional datasets (three internal, one external, 207 scans total) by comparing the distributions of average apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and volume of the spinal cord derived from a two-component Gaussian mixture model of segmented regions. Our pipeline subsequently standardises WBDWI signal intensity through two stages: (i) normalisation of signal between imaging stations within each patient through histogram equalisation of slices acquired on either side of the station gap, and (ii) inter-scan normalisation through histogram equalisation of the signal derived within segmented spinal canal regions. This approach was semi-quantitatively validated in all scans available to the study (N = 287).

resultsThe test dice score, precision, and recall of the spinal canal segmentation model were all above 0.87 when compared to manual delineation. The average ADC for the spinal cord (1.7 × 10

conclusionOur proposed intensity signal WBDWI normalisation pipeline successfully harmonises intensity values across multi-centre cohorts. The computational time required is less than 10 s, preserving contrast-to-noise and signal-to-noise ratios in axial diffusion-weighted images. Importantly, no changes to the clinical MRI protocol are expected, and there is no need for additional reference MRI data or follow-up scans.

Indexed as

deep learningmetastatic bone diseasemultiple myelomasegmentationWhole-Body Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (WBDWI)

Identifiers

PMID38391616
PMCPMC10885936
OpenAlexW4391324368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.