Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38391606›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Exploring Diagnostic Precision and Triage Proficiency: A Comparative Study of GPT-4 and Bard in Addressing Common Ophthalmic Complaints.

Roya Zandi, Joseph D Fahey, Michael Drakopoulos, John M Bryan, Siyuan Dong, Paul J Bryar, Ann E Bidwell, R Chris Bowen, Jeremy A Lavine, Rukhsana G Mirza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Roya ZandiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0611-6349
Joseph D FaheyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Michael DrakopoulosDepartment of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
John M BryanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2085-5113
Siyuan DongDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8719-137X
Paul J BryarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8494-3089
Ann E BidwellDepartment of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
R Chris BowenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Jeremy A LavineDepartment of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0884-1336
Rukhsana G MirzaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

Funding

Investigating the function and mechanism of interleukin 7 receptor-expressing pro-angiogenic macrophages during experimental choroidal neovascularizationR01EY034486 · NEI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Jeremy A Lavine · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
The role of beta2-adrenergic receptor and interleukin-6 signaling in macrophage-driven choroidal neovascularizationK08EY030923 · NEI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI LAVINE, JEREMY A · 2020 to 2024
$972k
NEI NIH HHS K08 EY030923NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034486NIH HHS K08 EY030923NIH HHS R01 EY034486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the modern era, patients often resort to the internet for answers to their health-related concerns, and clinics face challenges to providing timely response to patient concerns. This has led to a need to investigate the capabilities of AI chatbots for ophthalmic diagnosis and triage. In this in silico study, 80 simulated patient complaints in ophthalmology with varying urgency levels and clinical descriptors were entered into both ChatGPT and Bard in a systematic 3-step submission process asking chatbots to triage, diagnose, and evaluate urgency. Three ophthalmologists graded chatbot responses. Chatbots were significantly better at ophthalmic triage than diagnosis (90.0% appropriate triage vs. 48.8% correct leading diagnosis;

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebardchatbotsChatGPTlarge language modelsophthalmologytriage

Identifiers

PMID38391606
PMCPMC10886029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.