Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38391591›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Kinematic Analysis of Human Gait in Healthy Young Adults Using IMU Sensors: Exploring Relevant Machine Learning Features for Clinical Applications.

Xavier Marimon, Itziar Mengual, Carlos López-de-Celis, Alejandro Portela, Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz, Iria Andrea Herráez, Albert Pérez-Bellmunt

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07096700 (Virtual Reality for Gait Training in Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07096700 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Virtual Reality for Gait Training in Multiple Sclerosis (VIRTUE): an Interventional Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Usl di BolognaRan2026 to 2026Enrolled12ConditionsMultiple SclerosisArmsVR and walking brace-based gait rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Wearable Online Freezing of Gait Detection and Cueing System.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xavier MarimonBioengineering Institute of Technology, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), 08195 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7653-6299
Itziar MengualBioengineering Institute of Technology, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), 08195 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0009-0003-4099-0360
Carlos López-de-CelisACTIUM Research Group, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), 08195 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9524-4248
Alejandro PortelaBioengineering Institute of Technology, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), 08195 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0868-346X
Jacobo Rodríguez-SanzACTIUM Research Group, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), 08195 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0419-1943
Iria Andrea HerráezBioengineering Institute of Technology, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), 08195 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0009-0004-6113-9900
Albert Pérez-BellmuntACTIUM Research Group, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), 08195 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5607-0708
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGait is the manner or style of walking, involving motor control and coordination to adapt to the surrounding environment. Knowing the kinesthetic markers of normal gait is essential for the diagnosis of certain pathologies or the generation of intelligent ortho-prostheses for the treatment or prevention of gait disorders. The aim of the present study was to identify the key features of normal human gait using inertial unit (IMU) recordings in a walking test.

methodsGait analysis was conducted on 32 healthy participants (age range 19-29 years) at speeds of 2 km/h and 4 km/h using a treadmill. Dynamic data were obtained using a microcontroller (Arduino Nano 33 BLE Sense Rev2) with IMU sensors (BMI270). The collected data were processed and analyzed using a custom script (MATLAB 2022b), including the labeling of the four relevant gait phases and events (Stance, Toe-Off, Swing, and Heel Strike), computation of statistical features (64 features), and application of machine learning techniques for classification (8 classifiers).

resultsSpider plot analysis revealed significant differences in the four events created by the most relevant statistical features. Among the different classifiers tested, the Support Vector Machine (SVM) model using a Cubic kernel achieved an accuracy rate of 92.4% when differentiating between gait events using the computed statistical features.

conclusionsThis study identifies the optimal features of acceleration and gyroscope data during normal gait. The findings suggest potential applications for injury prevention and performance optimization in individuals engaged in activities involving normal gait. The creation of spider plots is proposed to obtain a personalised fingerprint of each patient's gait fingerprint that could be used as a diagnostic tool. A deviation from a normal gait pattern can be used to identify human gait disorders. Moving forward, this information has potential for use in clinical applications in the diagnosis of gait-related disorders and developing novel orthoses and prosthetics to prevent falls and ankle sprains.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencefallsgaitgait analysismachine learningorthesiswalking

Identifiers

PMID38391591
PMCPMC10886386
OpenAlexW4391138706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.