Expression of the Antimicrobial Peptide SE-33-A2P, a Modified Analog of Cathelicidin, and an Analysis of Its Properties.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Antimicrobial Peptides of the Cathelicidin Family: Focus on LL-37 and Its Modifications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
   Review
2. Genetically Modified Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells as a Delivery Platform for SE-33, a Cathelicidin LL-37 Analogue: Preclinical Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Distribution in C57BL/6 Mice.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
   Article
3. Antimicrobial Peptides: Mechanism, Expressions, and Optimization Strategies.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025
   Review
4. Preclinical Evaluation of the Safety, Toxicity and Efficacy of Genetically Modified Wharton's Jelly Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Expressing the Antimicrobial Peptide SE-33.Cells · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as