Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38391490›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2024

Comparative Study of the Quality of Life and Coping Strategies in Oncology Patients.

Silmara Meneguin, Izadora Gama Alves, Heloiza Thais Felipe Camargo, Camila Fernandes Pollo, Amanda Vitoria Zorzi Segalla, Cesar de Oliveira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association between coping strategies and benefit finding in adult cancer patients: a meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Healthcare workers' real experiences with lung cancer: a qualitative study in China.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Silmara MeneguinDepartment of Nursing, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, São Paulo 18618-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3853-5134
Izadora Gama AlvesDepartment of Nursing, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, São Paulo 18618-970, Brazil.
Heloiza Thais Felipe CamargoDepartment of Nursing, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, São Paulo 18618-970, Brazil.
Camila Fernandes PolloDepartment of Nursing, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, São Paulo 18618-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0264-5841
Amanda Vitoria Zorzi SegallaDepartment of Nursing, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, São Paulo 18618-970, Brazil.
Cesar de OliveiraDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4099-4762
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/T008822/11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the current data on morbidity and mortality, a growing number of patients with a diagnosis of cancer survive due to an early diagnosis and advances in treatment modalities. This study aimed to compare the quality of life and coping strategies in three groups of patients with cancer and identify associated clinical and sociodemographic characteristics.

methodsA comparative study was conducted with outpatients at a public hospital in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. The 300 participants were assigned to three groups: patients in palliative care (Group A), patients in post-treatment follow-up with no evidence of disease (Group B), and patients undergoing treatment for cancer (Group C). Data collection involved the use of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire and the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. No generic quality-of-life assessment tool was utilized, as it would not be able to appropriately evaluate the impact of the disease on the specific group of patients receiving palliative care.

resultsCoping strategies were underused. Participants in the palliative care group had poorer quality of life, particularly in the psychological well-being and physical symptom domains. Age, currently undergoing treatment, and level of education were significantly associated with coping scores. Age, gender, income, and the absence of pharmacological pain control were independently associated with quality-of-life scores. Moreover, a positive association was found between coping and quality of life.

conclusionCancer patients in palliative care generally report a lower quality of life. However, male patients, those who did not rely on pharmacological pain control, and those with higher coping scores reported a better perception of their quality of life. This perception tended to decrease with age and income level. Patients currently undergoing treatment for the disease were more likely to use coping strategies. Patients with higher education and quality-of-life scores also had better coping scores. However, the use of coping strategies decreased with age.

Indexed as

cancercoping strategiespalliative carequality of life

Identifiers

PMID38391490
PMCPMC10887505
OpenAlexW4391599020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.