ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Preparation and Performance Evaluation of Ionic Liquid Copolymer Shale Inhibitor for Drilling Fluid Gel System.
Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
An inhibitor that can effectively inhibit shale hydration is necessary for the safe and efficient development of shale gas. In this study, a novel ionic liquid copolymer shale inhibitor (PIL) was prepared by polymerizing the ionic liquid monomers 1-vinyl-3-aminopropylimidazolium bromide, acrylamide, and methacryloyloxyethyl trimethyl ammonium chloride. The chemical structure was characterized using fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and hydrogen-nuclear magnetic resonance (H-NMR), and the inhibition performance was evaluated using the inhibition of slurrying test, bentonite flocculation test, linear expansion test, and rolling recovery test. The experimental results showed that bentonite had a linear expansion of 27.9% in 1 wt% PIL solution, 18% lower than that in the polyether amine inhibitor. The recovery rate of shale in 1 wt% PIL was 87.4%. The ionic liquid copolymer could work synergistically with the filtrate reducer, reducing filtration loss to 7.2 mL with the addition of 1%. Mechanism analysis showed that PIL adsorbed negatively charged clay particles through cationic groups, which reduced the electrostatic repulsion between particles. Thus, the stability of the bentonite gel systems was destroyed, and the hydration dispersion and expansion of bentonite were inhibited. PIL formed a hydrophobic film on the surface of clay and prevented water from entering into the interlayer of clay. In addition, PIL lowered the surface tension of water, which prevented the water from intruding into the rock under the action of capillary force. These are also the reasons for the superior suppression performance of PIL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.