ArticleACS applied bio materials2024
The Regenerative Capacity of Tissue-Engineered Amniotic Membranes.
Article in ACS applied bio materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improved healing and tissue regeneration for prevention and treatment of pelvic floor disorders: from reactive treatment to proactive prevention.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Elevating Dermatology Beyond Aesthetics: Perinatal-Derived Advancements for Rejuvenation, Alopecia Strategies, Scar Therapies, and Progressive Wound Healing.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scaffolds can be introduced as a source of tissue in reconstructive surgery and can help to improve wound healing. Amniotic membranes (AMs) as scaffolds for tissue engineering have emerged as promising biomaterials for surgical reconstruction due to their regenerative capacity, biocompatibility, gradual degradability, and availability. They also promote fetal-like scarless healing and provide a bioactive matrix that stimulates cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation. The aim of this study was to create a tissue-engineered AM-based implant for the repair of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF), a defect between the bladder and vagina caused by prolonged obstructed labor. Layers of AMs (with or without cross-linking) and electrospun poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) (a synthetic, degradable polymer) scaffold were joined together by fibrin glue to produce a multilayer scaffold. Human vaginal fibroblasts were seeded on the different constructs and cultured for 28 days. Cell proliferation, cell morphology, collagen deposition, and metabolism measured by matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity were evaluated. Vaginal fibroblasts proliferated and were metabolically active on the different constructs, producing a distributed layer of collagen and proMMP-2. Cell proliferation and the amount of produced collagen were similar across different groups, indicating that the different AM-based constructs support vaginal fibroblast function. Cell morphology and collagen images showed slightly better alignment and organization on the un-cross-linked constructs compared to the cross-linked constructs. It was concluded that the regenerative capacity of AM does not seem to be affected by mechanical reinforcement with cross-linking or the addition of P4HB and fibrin glue. An AM-based implant for surgical repair of internal organs requiring load-bearing functionality can be directly translated to other types of surgical reconstruction of internal organs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.