ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2024
Clinical outcomes of rhabdomyolysis & validation of McMahon Score for risk prediction.
Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors associated with acute kidney injury in rhabdomyolysis: Insights from a prospective study.World journal of nephrology · 2026Article
- Critical care considerations in rhabdomyolysis-associated acute kidney injury and kidney replacement therapy.World journal of nephrology · 2026Review
- McMahon Score as a predictor of mortality in lightning-associated rhabdomyolysis.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
objectivesRhabdomyolysis in tropics has a unique aetiology and clinical profile. The objective of this study was to determine the aetiology and clinical outcomes of rhabdomyolysis and validate the McMahon risk prediction score in affected individuals from south India.
methodsA retrospective study of affected individuals with rhabdomyolysis admitted to a tertiary care hospital in south India, between January 2015 and June 2020, was undertaken. In-patients who were ≥15 yr in age and had creatinine phosphokinase ≥5000 U/l were included in the study. Cardiac, stroke, chronic muscular diseases and chronic kidney disease on maintenance haemodialysis were excluded. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in this group was calculated. Other clinical outcomes determined were 28-day mortality, proportion of individuals who required renal replacement therapy (RRT), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, vasopressors, mechanical ventilation (MV), number of days on mechanical ventilator and length of stay in ICU and hospital. Validation of McMahon risk prediction score for the requirement of RRT and mortality was performed.
resultsMajor aetiologies identified in the 75 study participants included were infections, trauma and seizures. Twenty eight-day mortality was 24 per cent (n=18). AKI incidence was 68 per cent, out of which 43.1 per cent had RRT. AKI in all survivors became dialysis independent. Vasopressors, MV and ICU requirement were 30.7, 32 and 77.3 per cent, respectively. Receiver operator characteristic curve for RRT and mortality risk prediction based on the McMahon Score showed a sensitivity of 71.4 per cent and specificity of 77.8 per cent for a cut-off ≥7.8. INTERPRETATION
conclusionsRhabdomyolysis in tropics is associated with significant organ dysfunction and mortality. Although the incidence of AKI and RRT is high, the overall renal outcome is good among survivors. The wide confidence intervals for the area under curve for McMahon Score limit its predictability for RRT and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.