ArticleMolecular medicine reports2024
[Corrigendum] Upregulation of centromere protein M promotes tumorigenesis: A potential predictive target for cancer in humans.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subsequently to the publication of this paper, the authors' have realized that Fig. 2A on p. 3927 was published featuring an error; specifically, there was an unintentional duplication of one of the representative images chosen for the figure (the same image was selected to represent the 'BRCA/Normal' and 'Tumor/LUSC' experiments). Additionally, the sample numbers in Fig. 2A were also incorrect. The correct sample numbers are as follows: 3 samples of breast tissue, 12 samples of breast cancer tissue, 3 samples of normal cervical tissue, 9 samples of CESC, 7 samples of LIHC, 3 samples of normal lung tissue and 6 samples of LUSC. These errors were due to negligence during the storage of HPA database images. The revised version of Fig. 2, showing the correct data for the 'Tumor/LUSC' experiment in Fig. 2A (where the error occurred), is shown on the next page. Note that this error did not significantly affect either the results or the conclusions reported in this paper, and all the authors agree to the corrigendum. The authors do stress the importance of a larger sample size to ascertain statistically significant differences in CENPM protein expression, predominantly localized in the cell nucleus. Furthermore, the authors thank the Editor of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.