Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38391000›Full record

ArticlePediatric reports2024

The Concept of Child-Centred Care in Healthcare: A Scoping Review.

Bernie Carter, Sarah Young, Karen Ford, Steven Campbell

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
34.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. When the Child Is Not Heard: Children's Rights and Epistemic Injustice in Paediatric Nursing Practice.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nurse leaders' perceptions of organisational policies, guidelines, and practices that enact children and young people's involvement in hospitals.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2026
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bernie CarterFaculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk L39 4QP, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5226-9878
Sarah YoungLaunceston Clinical School, Tasmanian School of Medicine, College of Health & Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3384-670X
Karen FordSchool of Nursing, College of Health & Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia.
Steven CampbellSchool of Nursing, College of Health & Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia.
University of Tasmania · AUEdge Hill University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although child-centred care is increasingly referred to within the nursing literature, a clear definition of child-centred care and clarity around the concept is yet to be achieved. The objectives of this review were to examine the following: (1) What constitutes the concept of child-centred care in healthcare? (2) How has the concept of child-centred care developed? (3) What is the applicability of child-centred care and what are its limitations? (4) How does the concept of child-centred care benefit and inform children's healthcare? In total, 2984 papers were imported for screening, and, following the removal of duplicates and screening, 21 papers were included in the scoping review. The findings suggest that child-centred care is an emerging, ambiguous poorly defined concept; no clear consensus exists about what constitutes child-centred care. Although it seems antithetical to argue against child-centred care, little robust evidence was identified that demonstrates the impact and benefit of child-centred care. If child-centred care is to be a sustainable, convincing model to guide practice and compete with other models of care, it needs to establish robust evidence of its effectiveness, the impact on children and their families, as well as the wider impacts on the healthcare system.

Indexed as

agencychild-centred carecommunicationdecision makingimpactparticipation

Identifiers

PMID38391000
PMCPMC10885088
OpenAlexW4391430803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.