Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38390974›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2024

Newborn Screening for Krabbe Disease: Status Quo and Recommendations for Improvements.

Dietrich Matern, Khaja Basheeruddin, Tracy L Klug, Gwendolyn McKee, Patricia U Edge, Patricia L Hall, Joanne Kurtzberg, Joseph J Orsini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Homozygosity for a Clinically SignificantInternational journal of neonatal screening · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Dietrich MaternBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6298-4138
Khaja BasheeruddinIllinois Department of Public Health, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Tracy L KlugMissouri State Public Health Laboratory, Jefferson City, MO 65101, USA.
Gwendolyn McKeeTennessee Department of Health, Division of Laboratory Services, Nashville, TN 37243, USA.
Patricia U EdgePennsylvania Department of Health, Harrisburg, PA 17120, USA.
Patricia L HallBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Joanne KurtzbergDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Joseph J OrsiniNewborn Screening Program, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12208, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7081-6027
Mayo Clinic · USDuke Medical Center · USIllinois Department of Public Health · USMissouri Department of Agriculture · USNew York State Department of Health · USPennsylvania Department of Health · USTennessee Department of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Krabbe disease (KD) is part of newborn screening (NBS) in 11 states with at least one additional state preparing to screen. In July 2021, KD was re-nominated for addition to the federal Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) in the USA with a two-tiered strategy based on psychosine (PSY) as the determinant if an NBS result is positive or negative after a first-tier test revealed decreased galactocerebrosidase activity. Nine states currently screening for KD include PSY analysis in their screening strategy. However, the nomination was rejected in February 2023 because of perceived concerns about a high false positive rate, potential harm to newborns with an uncertain prognosis, and inadequate data on presymptomatic treatment benefit or harm. To address the concern about false positive NBS results, a survey was conducted of the eight NBS programs that use PSY and have been screening for KD for at least 1 year. Seven of eight states responded. We found that: (1) the use of PSY is variable; (2) when modeling the data based on the recommended screening strategy for KD, and applying different cutoffs for PSY, each state could virtually eliminate false positive results without major impact on sensitivity; (3) the reason for the diverse strategies appears to be primarily the difficulty of state programs to adjust screening algorithms due to the concern of possibly missing even an adult-onset case following a change that focuses on infantile and early infantile KD. Contracts with outside vendors and the effort/cost of making changes to a program's information systems can be additional obstacles. We recommend that programs review their historical NBS outcomes for KD with their advisory committees and make transparent decisions on whether to accept false positive results for such a devastating condition or to adjust their procedures to ensure an efficient, effective, and manageable NBS program for KD.

Indexed as

false positive rategalactocerebrosidasegloboid cell leukodystrophyhematopoietic stem cell transplantKrabbe diseasenewborn screeningpsychosine

Identifiers

PMID38390974
PMCPMC10885092
OpenAlexW4391323407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.