ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2024
Newborn Screening for Krabbe Disease: Status Quo and Recommendations for Improvements.
Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Homozygosity for a Clinically SignificantInternational journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
- Review
- Pediatrician involvement in communicating positive newborn screening results for Krabbe disease: barriers, facilitators, and ideas for interventions.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Expert Recommendations for Rapid Response to Positive Newborn Screen for Infantile Krabbe Disease.Neurology. Genetics · 2026Review
- Benchmarking genetic birth prevalence estimates against newborn screening data.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Thoracic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax in a long-term survivor of infantile Krabbe disease: a case report.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Sphingolipid-neutralizing molecular therapy reduces psychosine cytotoxicity in Krabbe disease.iScience · 2026Article
- Caregiver-reported disease burden in Krabbe disease: evaluating outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- A Zebra in Horse's Clothing: Rethinking the Diagnosis of Rare Diseases.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2025Review
- Exosomes in Regulating miRNAs for Biomarkers of Neurodegenerative Disorders.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Krabbe disease (KD) is part of newborn screening (NBS) in 11 states with at least one additional state preparing to screen. In July 2021, KD was re-nominated for addition to the federal Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) in the USA with a two-tiered strategy based on psychosine (PSY) as the determinant if an NBS result is positive or negative after a first-tier test revealed decreased galactocerebrosidase activity. Nine states currently screening for KD include PSY analysis in their screening strategy. However, the nomination was rejected in February 2023 because of perceived concerns about a high false positive rate, potential harm to newborns with an uncertain prognosis, and inadequate data on presymptomatic treatment benefit or harm. To address the concern about false positive NBS results, a survey was conducted of the eight NBS programs that use PSY and have been screening for KD for at least 1 year. Seven of eight states responded. We found that: (1) the use of PSY is variable; (2) when modeling the data based on the recommended screening strategy for KD, and applying different cutoffs for PSY, each state could virtually eliminate false positive results without major impact on sensitivity; (3) the reason for the diverse strategies appears to be primarily the difficulty of state programs to adjust screening algorithms due to the concern of possibly missing even an adult-onset case following a change that focuses on infantile and early infantile KD. Contracts with outside vendors and the effort/cost of making changes to a program's information systems can be additional obstacles. We recommend that programs review their historical NBS outcomes for KD with their advisory committees and make transparent decisions on whether to accept false positive results for such a devastating condition or to adjust their procedures to ensure an efficient, effective, and manageable NBS program for KD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.