Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38390963›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

Phenotype prediction from single-cell RNA-seq data using attention-based neural networks.

Yuzhen Mao, Yen-Yi Lin, Nelson K Y Wong, Stanislav Volik, Funda Sar, Colin Collins, Martin Ester

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuzhen MaoSchool of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.
Yen-Yi LinDepartment of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4379-1231
Nelson K Y WongDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, BC Cancer, Vancouver BC V5Z 1L3, Canada.
Stanislav VolikVancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC V6H 3Z6, Canada.
Funda SarDepartment of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Colin CollinsDepartment of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Martin EsterSchool of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.

Funding

CIHR PJT-175238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationA patient's disease phenotype can be driven and determined by specific groups of cells whose marker genes are either unknown or can only be detected at late-stage using conventional bulk assays such as RNA-Seq technology. Recent advances in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) enable gene expression profiling in cell-level resolution, and therefore have the potential to identify those cells driving the disease phenotype even while the number of these cells is small. However, most existing methods rely heavily on accurate cell type detection, and the number of available annotated samples is usually too small for training deep learning predictive models.

resultsHere, we propose the method ScRAT for phenotype prediction using scRNA-seq data. To train ScRAT with a limited number of samples of different phenotypes, such as coronavirus disease (COVID) and non-COVID, ScRAT first applies a mixup module to increase the number of training samples. A multi-head attention mechanism is employed to learn the most informative cells for each phenotype without relying on a given cell type annotation. Using three public COVID datasets, we show that ScRAT outperforms other phenotype prediction methods. The performance edge of ScRAT over its competitors increases as the number of training samples decreases, indicating the efficacy of our sample mixup. Critical cell types detected based on high-attention cells also support novel findings in the original papers and the recent literature. This suggests that ScRAT overcomes the challenge of missing marker genes and limited sample number with great potential revealing novel molecular mechanisms and/or therapies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code of our proposed method ScRAT is published at https://github.com/yuzhenmao/ScRAT.

Indexed as

Single-Cell AnalysisSingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisCluster AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPhenotypeRNA-SeqSequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID38390963
PMCPMC10902676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.