ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2024
Automated planning of stereotactic spine re-irradiation using cumulative dose limits.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment planning for lung cancer reirradiation accounting for previously delivered dose.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Improving reirradiation of recurrent non-small cell lung cancer through non-coplanar beam arrangements.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Individualised dose mapping uncertainty estimation in the reirradiation setting.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Clinical workflow for reirradiation: national consensus recommendations on imaging, treatment planning, dose accumulation, and treatment delivery.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
- Deformable Image Registration Uncertainty-Encompassing Dose Accumulation for Adaptive Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025Article
- Reirradiation - still navigating uncharted waters?Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Reirradiation: Standards, challenges, and patient-focused strategies across tumor types.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansReview
- RAdiotherapy Dose Accumulation Routine (RADAR)-A Novel Dose Accumulation Script With Built-In Uncertainty.Practical radiation oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Purpose: The lack of dedicated tools in commercial planning systems currently restricts efficient review and planning for re-irradiation. The aim of this study was to develop an automated re-irradiation planning framework based on cumulative doses. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 14 patients who received spine SBRT re-irradiation near a previously irradiated treatment site. A fully-automated workflow, DART ( Results: All DART plans met institutional physical and cumulative constraints and passed plan checks by qualified medical physicists. DART demonstrated significant improvements in target coverage over clinical plans, with an average increase in PTV D Conclusions: DART provides a powerful framework to achieve more tailored re-irradiation plans by accounting for dose distributions from the previous treatments. The superior plan quality could improve the therapeutic ratio for re-irradiation patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.