Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38390552›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India

Effectiveness of Head-and-Neck Molecular Imaging Reporting and Data System Criterion in Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma PostConcurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

Manoj Gupta, Ankush Jajodia, Parveen Ahlawat, Munish Gairola, Mudit Agarwal, Sumit Goyal, Parv Mehta, Partha Sarathi Choudhury

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Manoj GuptaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Ankush JajodiaDepartment of Radiology, Juravinski Hospital, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Parveen AhlawatDepartment of Radiotherapy, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Munish GairolaDepartment of Radiotherapy, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Mudit AgarwalDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Sumit GoyalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Parv MehtaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Partha Sarathi ChoudhuryDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Juravinski Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Postconcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response assessment has been challenging in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) due to prevailing postradiation changes. Molecular response methods have been encouraging, although further clarifications and validations were needed. We tested the effectiveness of a proposed semi-quantitative molecular response criterion in these patients. Materials and Methods: Two subspecialty-trained physicians evaluated Results: Metastasis was developed in 11/83 patients at 3 months of evaluation. Of 72 patients, 39, 2, and 31 patients had a complete response, equivocal response, and partial response as per HAN-MI-RADS. Per patient sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for predicting loco-regional disease up to 1 and 2 years was 93.3%, 92.5%, 90.3%, 94.9%, 92.9%, and 84.9%, 91.9%, 90.3%, 87.2%, and 88.6% respectively. One year and two years DFI for each HAN-MI-RADS score showed a statistically significant difference while it was not for OS. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed significantly better outcome predictability of HAN-MI-RADS (area under the curve [AUC] 0.884) than Hopkins (AUC 0.699). Conclusions: A five points HAN-MI-RADS criterion was found promising for response assessment with less equivocal results and statistically significant higher AUC than Hopkins for loco-regional recurrence prediction.

Indexed as

Concurrent chemo-radiotherapyhead-and-neck molecular imaging-reporting and data systemhead-and-neck squamous cell carcinomaHopkins scoremolecular response

Identifiers

PMID38390552
PMCPMC10880860
OpenAlexW4390055347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.