Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38390503›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2024

Perovskite materials in X-ray detection and imaging: recent progress, challenges, and future prospects.

Md Helal Miah, Mayeen Uddin Khandaker, Mohammad Aminul Islam, Mohammad Nur-E-Alam, Hamid Osman, Md Habib Ullah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Mechanical Stress-Induced Defects in Thick a-PbO Layers.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Progress and opportunities in bismuth-based materials for X-ray detection.MRS energy & sustainability : a review journal · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Md Helal MiahApplied Physics and Radiation Technologies Group, CCDCU, School of Engineering and Technology, Sunway University Bandar Sunway 47500 Selangor Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7899-180X
Mayeen Uddin KhandakerApplied Physics and Radiation Technologies Group, CCDCU, School of Engineering and Technology, Sunway University Bandar Sunway 47500 Selangor Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3772-294X
Mohammad Aminul IslamDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya Kuala Lumpur 50603 Selangor Malaysia.
Mohammad Nur-E-AlamInstitute of Sustainable Energy, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Jalan IKRAM-UNITEN Kajang 43000 Selangor Malaysia.
Hamid OsmanDepartment of Radiological Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University 21944 Taif Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5370-7358
Md Habib UllahDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science and Technology, American International University-Bangladesh 408/1, Kuratoli, Khilkhet Dhaka 1229 Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7675-8681

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perovskite materials have attracted significant attention as innovative and efficient X-ray detectors owing to their unique properties compared to traditional X-ray detectors. Herein, chronologically, we present an in-depth analysis of X-ray detection technologies employing organic-inorganic hybrids (OIHs), all-inorganic and lead-free perovskite material-based single crystals (SCs), thin/thick films and wafers. Particularly, this review systematically scrutinizes the advancement of the diverse synthesis methods, structural modifications, and device architectures exploited to enhance the radiation sensing performance. In addition, a critical analysis of the crucial factors affecting the performance of the devices is also provided. Our findings revealed that the improvement from single crystallization techniques dominated the film and wafer growth techniques. The probable reason for this is that SC-based devices display a lower trap density, higher resistivity, large carrier mobility and lifetime compared to film- and wafer-based devices. Ultimately, devices with SCs showed outstanding sensitivity and the lowest detectable dose rate (LDDR). These results are superior to some traditional X-ray detectors such as amorphous selenium and CZT. In addition, the limited performance of film-based devices is attributed to the defect formation in the bulk film, surfaces, and grain boundaries. However, wafer-based devices showed the worst performance because of the formation of voids, which impede the movement of charge carriers. We also observed that by performing structural modification, various research groups achieved high-performance devices together with stability. Finally, by fusing the findings from diverse research works, we provide a valuable resource for researchers in the field of X-ray detection, imaging and materials science. Ultimately, this review will serve as a roadmap for directing the difficulties associated with perovskite materials in X-ray detection and imaging, proposing insights into the recent status, challenges, and promising directions for future research.

Identifiers

PMID38390503
PMCPMC10883145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.