Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38390391›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Using vulnerability assessment to characterize coastal protection benefits provided by estuarine habitats of a dynamic intracoastal waterway.

Gregory M Verutes, Philip F Yang, Scott F Eastman, Cheryl L Doughty, Therese E Adgie, Kaitlyn Dietz, Nicole G Dix, Allix North, Gregory Guannel, Samantha K Chapman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gregory M VerutesBlue Forest Conservation, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Philip F YangCenter for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Stewardship and Department of Biology, Villanova University, Villanova, PA, United States.
Scott F EastmanGuana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, United States.
Cheryl L DoughtyDepartment of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Therese E AdgieCenter for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Stewardship and Department of Biology, Villanova University, Villanova, PA, United States.
Kaitlyn DietzGuana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, United States.
Nicole G DixGuana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, United States.
Allix NorthGuana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, United States.
Gregory GuannelCaribbean Green Technology Center, University of the Virgin Islands, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands, United States.
Samantha K ChapmanCenter for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Stewardship and Department of Biology, Villanova University, Villanova, PA, United States.
Villanova University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of the Virgin Islands · VI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The existence of coastal ecosystems depends on their ability to gain sediment and keep pace with sea level rise. Similar to other coastal areas, Northeast Florida (United States) is experiencing rapid population growth, climate change, and shifting wetland communities. Rising seas and more severe storms, coupled with the intensification of human activities, can modify the biophysical environment, thereby increasing coastal exposure to storm-induced erosion and inundation. Using the Guana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve as a case study, we analyzed the distribution of coastal protection services-expressly, wave attenuation and sediment control-provided by estuarine habitats inside a dynamic Intracoastal waterway. We explored six coastal variables that contribute to coastal flooding and erosion-(a) relief, (b) geomorphology, (c) estuarine habitats, (d) wind exposure, (e) boat wake energy, and (f) storm surge potential-to assess physical exposure to coastal hazards. The highest levels of coastal exposure were found in the north and south sections of the Reserve (9% and 14%, respectively) compared to only 4% in the central, with exposure in the south driven by low wetland elevation, high surge potential, and shorelines composed of less stable sandy and muddy substrate. The most vulnerable areas of the central Reserve and main channel of the Intracoastal waterway were exposed to boat wakes from larger vessels frequently traveling at medium speeds (10-20 knots) and had shoreline segments oriented towards the prevailing winds (north-northeast). To guide management for the recently expanded Reserve into vulnerable areas near the City of Saint Augustine, we evaluated six sites of concern where the current distribution of estuarine habitats (mangroves, salt marshes, and oyster beds) likely play the greatest role in natural protection. Spatially explicit outputs also identified potential elevation maintenance strategies such as living shorelines, landform modification, and mangrove establishment for providing coastal risk-reduction and other ecosystem-service co-benefits. Salt marshes and mangroves in two sites of the central section (N-312 and S-312) were found to protect more than a one-quarter of their cross-shore length (27% and 73%, respectively) from transitioning to the highest exposure category. Proposed interventions for mangrove establishment and living shorelines could help maintain elevation in these sites of concern. This work sets the stage for additional research, education, and outreach about where mangroves, salt marshes, and oyster beds are most likely to reduce risk to wetland communities in the region.

Indexed as

EcosystemWetlandsClimate ChangeFloridaHumansSea Level RiseCoastal vulnerabilityCVIEcosystem servicesFloridaNatural capitalNERRS

Identifiers

PMID38390391
PMCPMC10883153
OpenAlexW4391929436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.