Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38390383›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2024

Effectiveness of the KC@H programme compared with clinic-based rehabilitation in patients recovering from ACL reconstruction: a study protocol for a single-centre, two-arm, single-blinded, randomised controlled superiority trial.

Joana Alegrete, Nuno Batalha, Orlando Fernandes, Jose Alberto Parraca, Ana Maria Rodrigues, Ana Rita Londral, João Paulo Sousa

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05828355 (Effectiveness of the KC@H Programme Compared With Clinic-based Rehabilitation in Patients Recovering From Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05828355 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effectiveness of the KC@H Programme Compared With Clinic-based Rehabilitation in Patients Recovering From Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Study Protocol for a Single-centre, Randomised Controlled Superiority Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ÉvoraRan2023 to 2024Enrolled56ConditionsAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionArmsKnee Care@Home Programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joana AlegreteDepartment of Sport and Health, Universidade de Évora, Evora, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1848-9487
Nuno BatalhaDepartment of Sport and Health, Universidade de Évora, Evora, Portugal.
Orlando FernandesDepartment of Sport and Health, Universidade de Évora, Evora, Portugal.
Jose Alberto ParracaDepartment of Sport and Health, Universidade de Évora, Evora, Portugal.
Ana Maria RodriguesComprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Universidade de Évora, Evora, Portugal.
Ana Rita LondralComprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Universidade de Évora, Evora, Portugal.
João Paulo SousaDepartment of Sport and Health, Universidade de Évora, Evora, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients who cannot fully comply with conventional clinic-based rehabilitation (CR) sessions after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) may find additional internet-based sessions beneficial. These remote sessions include therapeutic exercises that can be done at home, potentially extending the reach of rehabilitation services to underserved areas, prolonging the duration of care and providing improved supervision. The study's main purpose is to determine if the Knee Care at Home (KC@H) programme is more effective than conventional CR alone in improving patient-reported, clinician-reported and physical functional performance outcome measures after ACLR. Additionally, the trial assesses the significance of changes in outcome measures for clinical practice. This protocol outlines a randomised controlled trial for postoperative recovery following ACLR. Adult participants of both sexes who meet specific criteria will be randomly assigned to either the CR group or the KC@H group. Only the latter group will receive internet-based sessions of therapeutic exercises at home and CR sessions. A follow-up evaluation will be conducted for both groups 12 weeks after the intervention ends. The trial protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidade de Évora and complies with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association. All recordings will be stored on a secure server with limited access and deleted as soon as they are no longer needed. The KC@H programme is expected to be superior to conventional CR for patients recovering from ACLR across multiple outcome measures. Also, the programme has the potential to promote superior recovery and extend the reach and duration of care. Trial registration number: NCT05828355.

Indexed as

Anterior cruciate ligamentExercise rehabilitationKnee ACLSports & exercise medicineSports rehabilitation programs

Identifiers

PMID38390383
PMCPMC10882313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.