SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2024
Efficacy and toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy-based combination therapy as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Real-World Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.Targeted oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Rethinking Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Integrative Genomics, Immunotherapy, and Molecular-Orthomolecular Strategies.Cancers · 2026Review
- Article
- First-Line Treatment Strategies in IMDC Favourable-Risk Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Oncology research · 2026Review
- One size does not fit all: rethinking IO-TKI use in favorable-risk metastatic ccRCC.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Metabolic-Immune Coupling in Urologic Cancers: Macrophage Reprogramming as a Therapeutic Nexus.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Review
- Advances in immunotherapy for renal cell carcinoma: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Deciphering the mechanistic landscape of immune checkpoint blockade in ccRCC: from molecular drivers to therapeutic responses.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Rational Design of Non-Toxic Multidrug Combinations Demonstrates Durable and Hypoxia-Enhanced Efficacy Against Renal Cell Carcinoma.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- TERT promoter methylation predicts overall survival, immune cell infiltration and response to immunotherapy in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Article
- The impact of deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy on survival in advanced renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Asian journal of urology · 2025Review
- Real-world comparison of the efficacy of first-line therapies and the influence of risk factors in advanced renal cell carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Case Report: Fatal myocarditis and myasthenia gravis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: concurrent dual adverse events in an older adult.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Moderate toxicity with late onset as a good omen: association between toxicity and survival in the checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy-a single center experience.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Observational
- Advances and challenges in cancer immunotherapy: mechanisms, clinical applications, and future directions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Validity and utility of switch-maintenance therapy with nivolumab in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-sensitive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: learning from NIVOSWITCH.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Article
- PDL1 targeting by miR-138-5p amplifies anti-tumor immunity and Jurkat cells survival in non-small cell lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Ketogenic diet enhances the anti-cancer effects of PD-L1 blockade in renal cell carcinoma.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show a significant overall survival advantage over standard advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) therapies, tumor response to these agents remains poor. Some studies have shown that combination therapy including an ICI appears to be the best treatment; however, the overall benefit in terms of efficacy and toxicity still needs to be assessed. Thus, we performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the differences in the efficacy of several combinations that include an ICI to provide a basis for clinical treatment selection. Methods: We conducted a thorough search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for articles from January 2010 to June 2023. R 4.4.2 and STATA 16.0 were used to analyze data; hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess the results. Results: An indirect comparison showed that nivolumab plus cabozantinib and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib were the most effective treatments for progression-free survival (PFS), with no significant differences between the two interventions (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.96-1.78; P=0.08); rank probability showed that pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib had a 57.1% chance of being the preferred treatment. In the absence of indirect comparisons between pembrolizumab plus axitinib, nivolumab plus ipilimumab, avelumab plus axitinib, nivolumab plus cabozantinib, and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib, pembrolizumab plus axitinib (40.2%) was the best treatment option for overall survival (OS). Compared to pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib, nivolumab plus ipilimumab (OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.65; P=0.02) and pembrolizumab plus axitinib (OR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.00-0.78; P<0.001) had a lower incidence of overall adverse events (AEs). Conclusion: Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib and pembrolizumab plus axitinib resulted in the highest PFS and OS rates, respectively. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib may be the best option when AEs are a concern. Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/, identifier INPLASY202410078.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.