ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Prevalence of a large panel of systemic autoantibodies in the Bavarian adult population.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The common HAQ STING allele prevents clinical penetrance of COPA syndrome.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Sex-specific associations between systemic autoantibodies and allergic sensitization or allergic disease - results from a population-based study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Autoimmune diseases commonly feature the presence of specific humoral autoantibodies. However, the prevalence of a large panel of systemic autoantibodies has never been assessed in the general population. We, therefore, described the prevalence of about 50 humoral systemic autoantibodies in a sample of the general Bavarian adult population. Methods: Non-fasting venous serum samples from 331 participants were analyzed for 7 autoantibody screening tests (nuclear, cytoplasmic, and mitotic ANA, ANCA, cANCA and pANCA, anti-ENA autoantibodies) and 44 different monospecific humoral non-organ specific/systemic autoantibodies using indirect immunofluorescence tests, ELISAs, and line blots. In order to assess associations between sex, age, BMI, education level, smoking status and the presence of systemic autoantibodies, logistic regression analyses were conducted. Results: At least one screening test was positive in 29.9% of the participants, and 42.3% of the participants were seropositive for at least one monospecific autoantibody. The most frequently found monospecific autoantibodies were rheumatoid factor (35.6%), ß2-glycoprotein 1 IgM (4.8%), and cardiolipin IgG (1.8%). Only few associations between sex, age, BMI, education, smoking status and autoantibody frequencies were observed. Conclusion: Systemic autoantibodies are common in the general Bavarian population, and largely independent of sex, age, BMI, education, or smoking status. The study results may give orientation to clinicians about the occurrence of autoantibodies in the population, not (yet) associated with clinical symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.