ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2024
Motion-artifact-free single shot two-beam optical coherence elastography system.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phantoms for use in optical coherence elastography.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Review
- A Low-Cost Laser Interferometric Elastography System for Skin Elasticity Measurement.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography of the Crystalline Lens: Safety.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: The assessment of the biomechanical properties of the skin using various imaging techniques has been used as a diagnostic tool in dermatology. Optical coherence elastography (OCE) is one of the techniques that allows for the measurement of elastic properties. OCE relies on measuring tissue displacements induced by external sources. Measuring the tissue's mechanical properties Aim: This study aimed to develop an OCE system that allows for minimizing the effects of bulk tissue movements. To achieve this, we designed a two-beam OCE system that simultaneously measures the tissue displacement at two locations on the sample. This allows for cancelling the effect of the tissue bulk movement, which is common to both measurement points. Approach: We used a piezoelectric transducer to generate surface acoustic waves (SAW) in the sample. The velocity of the excited waves, which is proportional to the rigidity of the sample, was measured by calculating the phase delay of the SAW at two locations on the sample. Simultaneous measurement at two locations was achieved by dividing a single light beam into two by focusing on the sample at two different locations. The two beams travel different optical path lengths, and the reflected signals were depth encoded in a single optical coherence tomography scan using a single reference beam. Results: The system was characterized using different tissue-mimicking phantoms and the skin of healthy volunteers at the wrist and the palm. We achieved an approximately 50-fold increase in phase sensitivity measurement. Conclusions: We designed a simple two-beam OCE system that effectively minimizes the effect of tissue movement. We believe that the presented system will find immediate applications in the clinic to monitor the progression of systemic sclerosis disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.