Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38390233›Full record

ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2024

A feasibility study investigating cortical hemodynamic changes during infinity walk with fNIRS.

Haroon Khan, Noman Naseer, Peyman Mirtaheri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Haroon KhanDepartment of Mechanical, Electronics, and Chemical Engineering, Oslo Metropolitan University, Pilestredet 46, 0167 Oslo, Norway.
Noman NaseerDepartment of Mechatronics and Biomedical Engineering, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Peyman MirtaheriDepartment of Mechanical, Electronics, and Chemical Engineering, Oslo Metropolitan University, Pilestredet 46, 0167 Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study seeks to explore the correlation between cortical activation and the Infinity Walk pattern, examining how the influence of foot overpronation and footwear may impact motor control. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), a portable and user-friendly neuroimaging technique, was used to measure hemodynamical changes in six individuals with non-critical pronation degrees. Participants perform the Infinity Walk under various footwear conditions while wearing an fNIRS portable imaging device. Results indicate a consistent hemodynamic pattern in both hemispheres during the Infinity Walk, with no significant differences observed across subjects and footwear conditions in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), pre-motor area, the supplementary motor cortex (PMA & SMC), the primary motor cortex (PMC), and Wernicke's area (WA). The impact of pronation and footwear on motor control remains inconclusive due to inconsistent hemodynamic patterns. Notably, the activation patterns in Broca's area (BA) and the temporal gyrus (TG) differ significantly from other brain regions. The balanced hemodynamic responses in the bilateral hemispheres may be attributed to the Infinity Walk's inherent walking pattern. These findings indicate a need for further investigation into the Infinity Walk to examine the similarities and distinctions in activation patterns within specific brain regions. Additionally, the impact of pronation necessitates more substantial experimental research to establish a correlation between pronation and cortical hemodynamics.

Indexed as

Cortical HemodynamicsFigure-of-8 WalkFootwearFunctional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)PronationThe Infinity WalkWalking Pattern

Identifiers

PMID38390233
PMCPMC10882108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.