ArticleHeliyon2024
The mediating role of leader-member exchange (LMX) in the structural relationship between organizational justice and employee voice behaviour in higher education.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Authentic leadership and employee psychological safety: the mediating role of leader-member exchange and the moderating effect of cultural collectivism.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Building positive workplace behaviors: how trust in the manager enhances sportsmanship behaviors through organizational trust.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Leading with Integrity: Impact of Ethical Leadership on Performance of Healthcare Professionals in Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Can employees' trust their supervisor? The role of high-performance work systems and stewardship climate on employee voice.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Within the vibrant yet complex ecosystem of higher education institutions, nurturing a culture of employee voice is critical for driving innovation, fostering engagement, and optimizing decision-making. However, it's still a complex task to identify the main factors influencing voice behaviour. This study ventures into this fertile ground, examining the mediating role of leader-member exchanges in the structural relationship between perceived organizational justice and employee voice behaviour in higher education. A correlational study design was used. A total of 361 participants were involved in the study. Data were collected using a questionnaire and analyzed using structural education modelling (SEM). The study found that both perceived organizational justice and leader-member exchange have a significant direct influence on employee voice behaviour, suggesting that both variables are important factors in predicting employee voice behaviour. Despite these effects, the contribution of leader-member exchange was found to be more impactful than perceived organizational justice. When the leader-member exchange is entered as a mediating variable in the structural model, the indirect effect of organizational justice becomes large. This suggests that when employees perceive their organization as fair, they are more likely to form positive relationships with their leaders and, as a result, these relationships lead to greater employee voice behaviour. Therefore, it can be concluded that higher education institutions are recommended to create a fair and equitable working environment strengthened by strong relationships between leaders and employees, as this directly contributes to improving employees' ability to express their thoughts and opinions for the benefit of the institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.