ArticleHeliyon2024
Comparison of three methods of intermittent fasting in high-fat-diet-induced obese mice.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of intermittent fasting on liver morphology in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A narrative review of animal studies and clinical trials.Histology and histopathology · 2026Review
- The 5:2 diet induces male-specific weight loss and sex-independent enhancement of lipid storage in mice via activation of GHSR.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- The effect of intermittent fasting on microbiota as a therapeutic approach in obesity.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Intermittent fasting (IF), describes a variety of diets that the individual is exposed to intermittent periods of fasting and refeeding. The present study was designed to compare the three most popular intermittent fasting methods in high-fat-diet-induced obese mice. Methods: 50 male C57BL/6 mice were divided into Normal Control (CN), High-Fat Control (CH), IF1 (Alternate Day Fasting), IF2 (Time-Restricted Feeding), IF3 (5:2 Diet) diets. In the first phase of the study, the mice were fed ad libitum either with a 54% Calorie high-fat (CH, IF1, IF2, IF3) or standard CHOW (CN) for 8 weeks. Then, in the intervention phase, the IF groups were fasted for four weeks based on their fasting protocol. At the end of the study, the mice fasting blood, liver and fat tissue samples were biochemically and pathologically assessed. Results: The weight loss during the fasting period in IF1 and IF2 groups was significantly greater than CH. The epididymal fat pad weight was significantly lower in IF2 and IF3 compared to CH. The serum Triglyceride was significantly greater in CH than in the CN group. The tissue injury scores of the high-fat-diet groups were significantly greater than CN. Also, the tissue injury score was greater in IF1 group compared to the high-fat control group. Conclusion: All of the fasting protocols can prompt acceptable energy restriction and the ADF and TRF protocols can significantly cause weight loss. Also, the TRF and 5:2 Diets can lower the visceral adiposity. However further human studies focusing on dietary adherence seem necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.