ArticleHeliyon2024
Construction of machine learning models based on transrectal ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound to predict preoperative regional lymph node metastasis of rectal cancer.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning radiomics models based on contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound for predicting distant metastasis in rectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Deep Learning Algorithm to Determine the Presence of Rectal Cancer from Transrectal Ultrasound Images.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Predictive Value of TRUS and CEUS Parameters for Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Constructing a machine learning model based on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to predict preoperative regional lymph node metastasis (RLNM) of rectal cancer and provide new references for decision-making. Materials and methods: 233 patients with rectal cancer were enrolled and underwent TRUS and CEUS prior to surgery. Clinicopathological and ultrasound data were collected to analyze the correlation of RLNM status, clinical features and ultrasound parameters. A 75% training set and 25% test set were utilized to construct seven machine learning algorithms. The DeLong test was used to assess the model's diagnostic performance, then chose the best one to predict RLNM of rectal cancer. Results: The diagnostic performance was most dependent on the following: MMT difference (36), length (30), location (29), AUC ratio (27), and PI ratio (24). The prediction accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1 score range of KNN, Bayes, MLP, LR, SVM, RF, and LightGBM were (0.553-0.857), (0.000-0.935), (0.600-1.000), (0.557-0.952), and (0.617-0.852), respectively. The LightGBM model exhibited the optimal accuracy (0.857) and F1 score (0.852). The AUC for machine learning analytics were (0.517-0.941, 95% CI: 0.380-0.986). The LightGBM model exhibited the highest AUC (0.941, 95% CI: 0.843-0.986), though no statistic significant showed in comparison with the SVM, LR, RF, and MLP models ( Conclusion: The LightGBM machine learning model based on TRUS combined with CEUS may help predict RLNM prior to surgery and provide new references for clinical treatment in rectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.