ArticleHeliyon2024
The optimization of college tennis training and teaching under deep learning.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transforming tennis with artificial intelligence: a bibliometric review.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To enhance the integration of deep learning into tennis education and instigate reforms in sports programs, this paper employs deep learning techniques to analyze tennis tactics. The experiments initially introduce the concepts of sports science and backpropagation neural networks. Subsequently, these theories are applied to formulate a comprehensive system of tennis tactical diagnostic indicators, encompassing construction principles, basic requirements, diagnostic indicator content, and evaluation indicator design. Simultaneously, a Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) is utilized to construct a tennis tactical diagnostic model. The paper concludes with a series of experiments conducted to validate the effectiveness of the constructed indicator system and diagnostic model. The results indicate the excellent performance of the neural network model when trained on tennis match data, with a mean squared error of 0.00037146 on the validation set and 0.0104 on the training set. This demonstrates the outstanding predictive capability of the model. Additionally, the system proves capable of providing detailed tactical application analysis when employing the tennis tactical diagnostic indicator system for real-time athlete diagnosis. This functionality offers robust support for effective training and coaching during matches. In summary, this paper aims to evaluate athletes' performance by constructing a diagnostic system, providing a solid reference for optimizing tennis training and education. The insights offered by this paper have the potential to drive reforms in sports programs, particularly in the realm of tennis education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.