Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38390107›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Improved automated tumor segmentation in whole-body 3D scans using multi-directional 2D projection-based priors.

Sambit Tarai, Elin Lundström, Therese Sjöholm, Hanna Jönsson, Alexander Korenyushkin, Nouman Ahmad, Mette A Pedersen, Daniel Molin, Gunilla Enblad, Robin Strand and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sambit TaraiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, SE-75185, Uppsala, Sweden.
Elin LundströmDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, SE-75185, Uppsala, Sweden.
Therese SjöholmDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, SE-75185, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hanna JönssonDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, SE-75185, Uppsala, Sweden.
Alexander KorenyushkinAntaros Medical AB, SE-43153, Mölndal, Sweden.
Nouman AhmadDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, SE-75185, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mette A PedersenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Daniel MolinDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden.
Gunilla EnbladDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden.
Robin StrandDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, SE-75237, Uppsala, Sweden.
Håkan AhlströmDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, SE-75185, Uppsala, Sweden.
Joel KullbergDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, SE-75185, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SEAntaros Medical (Sweden) · SESteno Diabetes Centers · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early cancer detection, guided by whole-body imaging, is important for the overall survival and well-being of the patients. While various computer-assisted systems have been developed to expedite and enhance cancer diagnostics and longitudinal monitoring, the detection and segmentation of tumors, especially from whole-body scans, remain challenging. To address this, we propose a novel end-to-end automated framework that first generates a tumor probability distribution map (TPDM), incorporating prior information about the tumor characteristics (e.g. size, shape, location). Subsequently, the TPDM is integrated with a state-of-the-art 3D segmentation network along with the original PET/CT or PET/MR images. This aims to produce more meaningful tumor segmentation masks compared to using the baseline 3D segmentation network alone. The proposed method was evaluated on three independent cohorts (autoPET, CAR-T, cHL) of images containing different cancer forms, obtained with different imaging modalities, and acquisition parameters and lesions annotated by different experts. The evaluation demonstrated the superiority of our proposed method over the baseline model by significant margins in terms of Dice coefficient, and lesion-wise sensitivity and precision. Many of the extremely small tumor lesions (i.e. the most difficult to segment) were missed by the baseline model but detected by the proposed model without additional false positives, resulting in clinically more relevant assessments. On average, an improvement of 0.0251 (autoPET), 0.144 (CAR-T), and 0.0528 (cHL) in overall Dice was observed. In conclusion, the proposed TPDM-based approach can be integrated with any state-of-the-art 3D UNET with potentially more accurate and robust segmentation results.

Indexed as

BackprojectionDeep learningMaximum intensity projectionMedical image analysisSegmentation priorWhole-body tumor segmentation

Identifiers

PMID38390107
PMCPMC10882139
OpenAlexW4391850617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.