ArticleHeliyon2024
Nepal's experience in implementing the federal government system: Assessment of law-making by the local governments of Kaski district, Nepal.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nepal 2015 institutionalizes the sovereign right of the people and the right to autonomy, shared rule and self-rule via the three levels of government: federal, provincial, and local. Accordingly, to deliver service to the local residents and to assure the residents of the practice of self-rule, the constitution has given state powers to the local levels with 22 exclusive mandates and 15 concurrent competencies and mandates. However, being the new practice in the Nepalese context, for implementing the delegated authority, related laws are to be formulated by the concerned local level. In this study, I assessed if the five local levels of Kaski district: Pokhara Metropolitan, Annapurna Rural Municipality, Machhapuchhre Rural Municipality, Madi Rural Municipality, and Rupa Rural Municipality in the first five years of their establishment formulated the requisite laws concerning the 22 local-level powers. I conducted a questionnaire survey and in-person interviews with the elected members of the local levels. The result revealed that during the first five years of operation (2017-2022), Pokhara Metropolitan formulated 98 laws, Annapurna Rural Municipality made 34 laws, Machhapuchhre Rural Municipality made 54 laws, Madi Rural Municipality made 88 laws, and Rupa Rural Municipality made 56 laws. The laws formed by the five local levels were of mainly two categories. The laws of the first category were related to the legal set-up of the local governments for the smooth functioning of administrative affairs which were almost identical across the five local levels. The laws of the second category were specific to the local level and thus apparently distinctive from each other, however, those laws were aimed towards providing service to the local residents, meeting the distinctive development aspirations of the local people and fulfilling the needs of local self-governance. Despite the deficiency of expertise in law-making and the limitation of resources, the local levels have laid a foundation for the functioning of local-level government. Although the local units of the Kaski district have put their best effort into formulating laws, they are yet insufficient to ensure the delivery of all the 22 constitution-delegated rights of the local residents. Therefore, the newly elected government should keep priority in formulating the remaining laws not only for the smooth functioning of the local government but also to assure the residents of the aspiration of self-governance and the constitution-granted rights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.