Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38390007›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2024

Developing a hippocampal neural prosthetic to facilitate human memory encoding and recall of stimulus features and categories.

Brent M Roeder, Xiwei She, Alexander S Dakos, Bryan Moore, Robert T Wicks, Mark R Witcher, Daniel E Couture, Adrian W Laxton, Heidi Munger Clary, Gautam Popli and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Large-Scale Mechanistic Models of Brain Circuits with Biophysically and Morphologically Detailed Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Brent M RoederWake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Xiwei SheDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Alexander S DakosWake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Bryan MooreDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Robert T WicksWake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Mark R WitcherWake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Daniel E CoutureWake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Adrian W LaxtonWake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Heidi Munger ClaryWake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Gautam PopliWake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Charles LiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Brian LeeUSC Keck Memorial Hospital, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Christianne HeckDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
George NuneUSC Keck Memorial Hospital, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Hui GongRancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Hospital, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Susan ShawRancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Hospital, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Vasilis Z MarmarelisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Theodore W BergerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Sam A DeadwylerWake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Dong SongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Robert E HampsonWake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USUniversity of Southern California · USMemorial Hospital · USRancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center · USJohns Hopkins University · USKeck Hospital of USC · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Here, we demonstrate the first successful use of static neural stimulation patterns for specific information content. These static patterns were derived by a model that was applied to a subject's own hippocampal spatiotemporal neural codes for memory. Approach: We constructed a new model of processes by which the hippocampus encodes specific memory items via spatiotemporal firing of neural ensembles that underlie the successful encoding of targeted content into short-term memory. A memory decoding model (MDM) of hippocampal CA3 and CA1 neural firing was computed which derives a stimulation pattern for CA1 and CA3 neurons to be applied during the encoding (sample) phase of a delayed match-to-sample (DMS) human short-term memory task. Main results: MDM electrical stimulation delivered to the CA1 and CA3 locations in the hippocampus during the sample phase of DMS trials facilitated memory of images from the DMS task during a delayed recognition (DR) task that also included control images that were not from the DMS task. Across all subjects, the stimulated trials exhibited significant changes in performance in 22.4% of patient and category combinations. Changes in performance were a combination of both increased memory performance and decreased memory performance, with increases in performance occurring at almost 2 to 1 relative to decreases in performance. Across patients with impaired memory that received bilateral stimulation, significant changes in over 37.9% of patient and category combinations was seen with the changes in memory performance show a ratio of increased to decreased performance of over 4 to 1. Modification of memory performance was dependent on whether memory function was intact or impaired, and if stimulation was applied bilaterally or unilaterally, with nearly all increase in performance seen in subjects with impaired memory receiving bilateral stimulation. Significance: These results demonstrate that memory encoding in patients with impaired memory function can be facilitated for specific memory content, which offers a stimulation method for a future implantable neural prosthetic to improve human memory.

Indexed as

CA1CA3cognitionneurophysiologynonlinearprosthetic

Identifiers

PMID38390007
PMCPMC10881797
OpenAlexW4391648550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.