Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38389998›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Acoustic monitoring yields informative bat population density estimates.

Meredith L Hoggatt, Clarissa A Starbuck, Joy M O'Keefe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Meredith L HoggattDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana Illinois USA.
Clarissa A StarbuckDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6842-2213
Joy M O'KeefeDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9074-6268

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bat population estimates are typically made during winter, although this is only feasible for bats that aggregate in hibernacula. While it is essential to measure summer bat population sizes for management, we lack a reliable method. Acoustic surveys should be less expensive and more efficient than capture surveys, and acoustic activity data are already used as indices of population size. Although we currently cannot differentiate individual bats by their calls, we can enter call counts, information on signal and detection angles, and weather data into generalized random encounter models to estimate bat density. We assessed the utility of generalized random encounter models for estimating Indiana bat (

Indexed as

acousticsbatsmonitoringpopulation densityrandom encounter model

Identifiers

PMID38389998
PMCPMC10883235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.