ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2024
Translating research into a relevant education activity to fulfil pharmacists' continuing professional development requirements.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In New Zealand (NZ), provision of culturally safe care by pharmacists is mandated, including an expectation of understanding issues relevant to Māori, the Indigenous people of NZ, yet there are few pharmacy-specific resources to support attainment. Objectives: To: i) test whether a research-informed education activity (short video summarising research findings plus reflective exercises) meets NZ pharmacists' annual continuing professional development requirements including those relating to culturally safe care ii) identify suggested improvements to the education activity; and iii) identify individual pharmacists' proposed actions in response to reflection prompted by the education activity. Methods: Previous research was utilised to develop an education activity (short, animated research summary video and reflective questions). Participants (NZ-registered pharmacists or intern pharmacists) were asked to watch the video and respond to questions online related to perceived relevance and usefulness of the video to informing practice and meeting CPD requirements. Simple descriptive analysis (quantitative data) and general inductive thematic analysis (qualitative data) were applied to the research data. Results: Thirty-three people participated from Nov-Dec 2022. Most participants said the video was relevant/very relevant to practice (91%), that the reflective exercise was very or extremely useful (100%) and that it met their CPD requirements as relevant to cultural safety (100%). Conclusion: The education activity appeared to be an appropriate and relevant for CPD and was seen to be concise and exposed ideas in a logical and succinct manner with the potential to benefit the populations receiving care from these providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.